期刊文献+

法律面前人人平等:谁的面前?何种平等? 被引量:3

Equality before the Law:Before Whom? Which Equality?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “法律面前人人平等”被视为法律的一项基本原则,但是该原则的适用范围,以及具备何种效力却是不清楚的,并且将其具体化为同案同判原则仍然将面临冗余的怀疑。内在于法律本身的平等在概念上依赖于规则的一般性,这是因为法律中的平等原则范围只能是在适用法律中的平等,而无法完全保证法律内容中的平等,并且也不能等同于完全正当的判决。但是,平等原则在法律制度中通过抽象化的方式予以实现,并且该形式性的平等原则仍然具有实质平等无法替代的规范重要性。 Equality before the law is treated as a foundational legal principle,but its range and force remain unclear.To specify this principle as “treat like cases alike” would still cause the doubt of redundancy.The kind of equality intrinsic to law conceptually depends on the generality of rules.And since the range of this principle is confined to the application of law,it cannot guarantee the law’s content being equal,nor does it amount to fully justified decisions.However,the principle of equality is realized in legal institutions by abstraction,and the normative force of such a formal principle cannot be replaced by any substantive principle of equality.
作者 骆意中 Luo Yizhong(Faculty of Law,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 北大核心 2023年第2期46-55,156,共11页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 同案同判 形式平等 实质平等 抽象化 treat like cases alike formal equality substantive equality abstraction
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献63

  • 1陈景辉.同案同判:法律义务还是道德要求[J].中国检察官,2013(17):74-74. 被引量:3
  • 2刘作翔,徐景和.案例指导制度的理论基础[J].法学研究,2006,28(3):16-29. 被引量:163
  • 3陈景辉.《实践理由与法律推理》,北京大学出版社,2012年,第2页.
  • 4Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law, revised edition, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969, pp. 65 -70.
  • 5Scott Shapiro, Legality, Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press, 2011, pp. 161-168, 172-176.
  • 6Andrei Marmor, "Should Like Cases be Treated Alike?", in his Law in the Age of Pluralism, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 184 - 187.
  • 7John R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essays in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969, pp. 34- 35.
  • 8Larry Alexander & Emily Sherwin, Demystifying Legal Reasoning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 36 -39.
  • 9Joseph Ras, Practical Reason and Norms, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd edition, 1990, pp. 25 -28.
  • 10John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge Mass. : Harvard University Press, revised edition:.

共引文献194

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部