期刊文献+

可视化非阻塞性压迫止血在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入术中的应用 被引量:2

Application of visualized non-obstructive compression hemostasis in performing transradial coronary angiography or interventional procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入术中应用可视化非阻塞性压迫止血的效果。方法将2020年9月至12月在山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)接受经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入治疗的220例患者中213例随机分为对照组(n=106)和观察组(n=107)。对照组采用常规桡动脉压迫器减压穿刺处止血治疗,观察组采用可视化指脉氧体积描记波监测下非阻塞性压迫穿刺处止血治疗。比较两组患者桡动脉压迫器压迫时长、术后1 h压迫疼痛程度、压力性损伤发生率及术后24 h桡动脉闭塞(RAO)发生率。结果观察组压迫器压迫时长显著短于对照组[(1.93±0.44)h比(9.66±0.76)h,t=91.166,P<0.001];疼痛数字评价量表(NRS)评分显著低于对照组[(0.76±0.97)分比(3.54±1.27)分,t=17.982,P<0.001];压力性损伤发生率显著低于对照组(1.87%比11.32%,χ^(2)=7.746,P=0.005),RAO发生率显著低于对照组(1.87%比14.15%,χ^(2)=10.937,P=0.001),差异均有统计学意义。结论可视化非阻塞性压迫止血可减轻患者压迫疼痛程度,降低压力性损伤和RAO发生率,且可缩短压迫器压迫时长,减少减压次数,提高医护人员工作效率。 Objective To investigate the effect of visualized non-obstructive compression hemostasis in performing transradial coronary angiography or interventional procedures.Methods A total of 213 patients,who received transradial coronary angiography or interventional treatment between September and December in 2020 at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao)of China,were randomly divided into control group(n=106)and observation group(n=107).Conventional radial artery compressor was used to make hemostasis of the puncture site for the patients of the control group,while under the guidance of visualized finger pulse oxygen plethysmograph wave the non-obstructive compression hemostasis of the puncture site was conducted for the patients of the observation group.The compression duration of the radial artery compressor,the postoperative one-hour pain degree,the incidence of pressure injury,and the postoperative 24-hour incidence of radial artery occlusion(RAO)were compared between the two groups.Results The compression duration in the observation group was(1.93±0.44)hours,which was significantly shorter than(9.66±0.76)hours in the control group(t=91.166,P<0.001).The NRS score in the observation group was(0.76±0.97)points,which was strikingly lower than(3.54±1.27)points in the control group(t=17.982,P<0.001).The incidence of pressure injury in the observation group was 1.87%,which was remarkably lower than 11.32%in the control group(χ^(2)=7.746,P=0.005).The incidence of RAO in the observation group was 1.87%,which was obviously lower than 14.15%in the control group(χ^(2)=10.937,P=0.001),the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Visualized non-obstructive compression hemostasis can alleviate the compression pain degree,reduce the incidence of pressure injury and the incidence of radial artery occlusion,shorten the compression duration of the radial artery compressor,lower the frequency of decompression,and improve the working efficiency of medical staff.(J Intervent Radiol,2022,31:1078-1081)
作者 王浩 孙倩 周晓美 WANG Hao;SUN Qian;ZHOU Xiaomei(Department of Cardiology,Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao),Qingdao,Shandong Province 266035,China)
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第11期1078-1081,共4页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
基金 山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)护理创新基金(QDKY2019HL01)。
关键词 指脉氧体积描记波 非阻塞性压迫止血 冠状动脉造影 冠状动脉介入治疗 桡动脉闭塞 finger pulse oxygen plethysmograph wave non-obstructive compression hemostasis coronary angiography percutaneous coronary intervention radial artery occlusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1杨淑兰.经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期的护理干预[J].青海医药杂志,2012,42(12):50-50. 被引量:6
  • 2周玉杰,赵迎新,曹政,傅向华,聂斌,刘宇扬,郭永和,成万钧,贾德安.经桡动脉介入诊疗术后急性桡动脉闭塞的发生率及其预测因素[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(22):1531-1534. 被引量:37
  • 3Honda T,Fujimoto K,Miyao Y,et al. Access site-related complicationsafter transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath sizeand statins[J]. Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2012,27(3) : 174-180.
  • 4Pancholy S,Coppola J,Patel T,et al. Prevention of radial artery occlu-sion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET Study) : a randomizedcomparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis aftertransradial catheterization[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2008,72(3):335-340.
  • 5Cubero JM,Lombardo J,Pedrosa C,et al.Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic de- vice(RACOMAP)[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2009,73(4):467-472.
  • 6Kohonen M,Teerenhovi O,Terho T,et al. Is the Allen test reliable enough?[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2007,32(6):902-905.
  • 7Barone JE,Madlinger RV. Should an Allen test be performed before radial artery cannulation?[J]. J Trauma,2006,61(2):468-470.
  • 8Sanmartin M,Gomez M,Rumoroso JR,et al. Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial cathe- terization[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2007,70(2):185-189.
  • 9Honda T, Fujimoto K, Miyao Y. et aI. Access site-related. Complications a{ter transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins [J]. Cardiovase Interv t- her,2012,27(3) : 174-180.
  • 10Pancholy S,loppola J,Pate T. et al. Prevention of radial artery occlu-sion-patent hemostasis evaluational versus patency docu- mented hemostasis a{ter transradial catheterization [J]. Cathe- ter cardiovasc Interv, 2008,72 (3) : 335-340.

共引文献101

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部