期刊文献+

基于人因可靠性的道岔失表故障处置量化分析 被引量:1

Quantitative Analysis of Turnout Loss of Indication Fault Disposal Based on Human Factor Reliability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对城市轨道交通车站值班员岗位道岔失表故障处置作业,构建THERP(人因失误率预测技术)和HCR(人员认知可靠性)模型,细化了道岔失表作业流程,开展了轨道交通标准化作业下人因失误量化分析。同时,基于贝叶斯估计模型,借助车站值班员作业仿真试验对先验分布函数的两个形状参数进行估计,验证了THERP+HCR模型的合理性。 Targeting the turnout loss of indication fault disposal operation of urban rail transit station attendant,the THERP(technology for human error rate prediction)and the HCR(human cognitive reliability)models are constructed.The operation process of turnout loss of indication is refined,and a quantitative analysis of human error under rail transit standardized operation is carried out.At the same time,based on Bayesian estimation model,the two shape parameters of prior distribution function are estimated by means of operation simulation test of station attendant,which verifies the rationality of the THERP+HCR model.
作者 陈宇 朱海燕 刘志钢 刘晓静 CHEN Yu;ZHU Haiyan;LIU Zhigang;LIU Xiaojing(School of Urban Railway Transportation,Shanghai University of Engineering Science,201620,Shanghai,China)
出处 《城市轨道交通研究》 北大核心 2023年第1期131-134,共4页 Urban Mass Transit
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(52072235) “十三五”国家重点研发计划子课题(2017YFC0804900)。
关键词 城市轨道交通 车站 人因可靠性 道岔失表故障 urban rail transit station human factor reliability turnout loss of indication fault
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Stephen Reinach. Preliminary development of a railroad dispatcher taskload assessment tool: Identification of dispatcher tasks and data collection methods[R]. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 2007.
  • 2Ryan B, Wilson J R, Sharpies S, et al. Developing a rail ergonomics questionnaire (REQUEST)[J]. Applied Ergonom- ics, 2009, 40(2) : 216 -229.
  • 3Read G J, Lenne M G, Moss S A. Associations between task training and social environmental factors and error types involved in rail incidents and accidents[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 48(4):416 -422.
  • 4Jensen F V. An introduction to Bayesian networks[M]. London : UCI, Press, 1996 : 15 - 26.
  • 5Sentz K, Ferson S. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory[M]. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories, 2002: 32 -45.
  • 6Embrey D E, Humphreys P C , Rosa E A, et al. SLIM-MAUD : An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgement[R]. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1984.
  • 7Huw Gibson. Railway action reliability assessment user manual: A technique for the quantification of human error in the rail industry[R]. Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd. , 2006.
  • 8刘莉,徐浩军,井凤玲,孙作.基于贝叶斯网络的飞行安全人因可靠性评估模型[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2009,10(3):5-9. 被引量:14
  • 9李鹏程,陈国华,张力,肖东生.一种整合组织因素的人因可靠性分析方法[J].核动力工程,2010,31(4):82-86. 被引量:8
  • 10侯政良,杨自春,初珠立.基于贝叶斯网络的船舶人因安全性评估模型[J].船舶工程,2011,33(1):78-81. 被引量:9

共引文献10

同被引文献32

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部