期刊文献+

成年女性骨性Ⅱ类高角错[牙合]患者拔牙掩饰治疗后软组织颏部突度变化的影响因素研究 被引量:1

Study on the soft mental protrusion changes in adult female patients with skeletal classⅡhigh-angle malocclusion after camouflage treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究影响成年女性骨性Ⅱ类高角错[牙合]患者拔牙掩饰治疗后软组织颏部突度变化的软硬组织因素以及治疗前后的硬组织变化规律,为其疗效评估和矫治设计提供参考。方法选取2017年1月至2020年10月于四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科完成拔牙掩饰治疗的成年女性骨性Ⅱ类高角错[牙合]患者48例,依据治疗前后头颅侧位片上软组织颏前点(Pos)矢状向的位移量将患者分为Pos后移组和Pos前移组,测量2组治疗前后的牙性、骨性及软组织指标。比较2组治疗前各项指标差异,以及各组治疗前后的硬组织指标变化。结果治疗前2组下颌中切牙矢状向位置(L1-H)、下颌第一磨牙近远中倾斜度(L6-MP)、上下唇及软组织颏部矢状向位置(UL-H、LL-H、Pos-H)比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Pos前移组治疗前后上下颌骨矢状向位置关系(ANB)、下颌平面角(MP-SN)、上下颌中切牙矢状向位置(U1-H、L1-H)及上下颌第一磨牙矢状向位置(U6-H、L6-H)、上下颌中切牙唇舌向转矩(U1-SN、L1-MP)、下颌第一磨牙近远中倾斜度(L6-MP)、上颌中切牙和上颌第一磨牙及下颌第一磨牙近中颊尖垂直向位置(U1-V′、U6d-V′、U6m-V′、L6m-V′)比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);而治疗前后上下牙槽座角(SNA、SNB)及上颌第一磨牙近远中倾斜度(U6-SN)比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。Pos后移组治疗前后SNA、SNB、U1-H、L1-H、U1-SN、L1-MP、上下颌第一磨牙近远中倾斜度(U6-SN、L6-MP)及下颌中切牙垂直向位置(L1-V′)比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);而治疗前后ANB、MP-SN、U6-H及L6-H比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论在成年女性骨性Ⅱ类高角错[牙合]患者中,下颌中切牙、上下唇及软组织颏部更前突,以及下颌第一磨牙近中倾斜程度更大者,可能更难通过拔牙掩饰治疗获得软组织颏部的前移。成年女性骨性Ⅱ类高角错[牙合]患者拔牙掩饰治疗可以更加精细地控制前牙内收量、磨牙近移量、前牙唇舌向转矩、磨牙近远中倾斜度以及上下颌前、后牙的压低量,从而尽可能达到软组织颏部的前移,更大程度改善患者侧貌。 Objective To explore the soft and hard tissue factors that affect the change of chin protrusion and the change rule of hard tissue before and after treatment in adult female patients with skeletal classⅡhigh-angle malocclusion who have completed tooth extraction camouflage therapy,and to provide reference for the efficacy evaluation and treatment design.Methods A total of 48 adult female patients with skeletal classⅡhigh-angle malocclusion who had completed tooth extraction camouflage therapy were selected.According to the sagittal change of the pogonion of soft tissue(Pos)on the lateral radiographs before and after treatment,the samples were divided into Pos backward shift group and Pos forward shift group.Measure the dental and skeletal indexes of the two groups and compare the differences of each index between the two groups before treatment,as well as the changes of hard tissue index before and after treatment in each groups.Results Before treatment,the sagittal position of mandibular central incisors(L1-H),the mesial and distal inclination of mandibular first permanent molars(L6-MP),the sagittal position of upper,lower lips and soft chin(UL-H,LL-H,Pos-H)were significantly different between the two groups(P<0.05).There were significant differences in the sagittal position relationship of maxilla and mandible(ANB),the mandibular plane angle(MP-SN),the sagittal position of upper and lower central incisors and first permanent molars(U1-H,L1-H,U6-H,L6-H),the labial and lingual torque of upper and lower central incisors(U1-SN,L1-MP),the mesial-distal inclination of mandibular first permanent molars(L6-MP),and the vertical position of upper central incisors,upper first permanent molars and the mesiobuccal cusp of lower first permanent molars(U1-V′,U6d-V′,U6m-V′,L6m-V′)in Pos-forward group before and after treatment,while there were no significant differences in the upper and lower alveolar angle(SNA,SNB)or the mesial-distal inclination of maxillary first permanent molars(U6-SN)(P>0.05).There were significant differences in SNA,SNB,U1-H,L1-H,U1-SN,L1-MP,U6-MP,L6-MP and U1-V′of the Pos-backword group before and after treatment(P<0.05),while there were no significant differences in ANB,MPSN,U6-H or L6-H(P>0.05).Conclusion For adult female patients with skeletal classⅡhigh-angle malocclusion,with more protruding lower central incisors,lips and soft tissue chin,and more mesial inclination of mandibular first permanent molars,it may be more difficult to obtain absolutely forward soft chin through orthodontic camouflage therapy.The orthodontic camouflage therapy may obtain the absolute forward soft tissue chin,so as to improve the patients′profile by controlling more carefully the amount of the anterior teeth retraction,mesially movement of the molars,the torque of the anterior teeth,the mesio-distal inclination of the molars and the amount of the anterior and posterior teeth intrusion.
作者 张冠凝 颜杉钰 李娟 ZHANG Guan-ning;YAN Shan-yu;LI Juan(State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease&National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease&Department of Orthodontics,West China Hospital of Stomatology,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;不详)
出处 《中国实用口腔科杂志》 CAS 2022年第6期675-682,共8页 Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(31971240) 产业技术基础公共服务平台项目(2021-0166-1-2)。
关键词 骨性Ⅱ类错[牙合]畸形 高角 成年女性 拔牙 头影测量 skeletal classⅡmalocclusion high angle adult female tooth extraction cephalometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1Anthony L.Maganzini,曾应魁,Josh Z.Epstein,Luis J.Alvarez,邹冰爽,曾祥龙.应用数字图象处理技术对颜面审美观的研究[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(3):107-110. 被引量:16
  • 2宋宇,周彦恒,林久祥.上前牙厚度对咬合关系的影响[J].口腔正畸学,2004,11(4):177-179. 被引量:5
  • 3Proffit WR.Contemporary orthodontics[M].4th ed.St.Louis:Mosby.2007.
  • 4Proffit WR.Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic[J].Angle Orthod,1994,64(6):407-714.
  • 5罗颂椒.当代实用正畸理论与实践[M].北京:北京医科大学协和医科大学联合出版社,1996:75-80.
  • 6Abdullah RTH.Kuijpers MAR,Berge SJ.et al.Steiner cephalometric analysis:predicted and actual treatment outcome compared[J].Orthod Craniofac Res,2006,9(2):77-83.
  • 7Andrews LF.The six keys to normal occlusion[J].Am J Orthod,1972.62(3):296-309.
  • 8Guilherme J,Adriana da CB.Class Ⅱ treatment success rate in 2-and 4-premolar extraction protocols[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,125(4):472-479.
  • 9叶禹.影响安氏Ⅱ1类错(he)畸形拔牙模式选择因素的回顾研究[D].成都:四川大学,2010.
  • 10Leitao PM.Lower incisor extraction in Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ,malocclusions:case reports[J].Prog Orthod,2004,5(2):186-199.

共引文献37

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部