“双一流”建设中的第三方评价——从“评价崇拜”到“评价赋能”

On Third-Party Evaluation in“Double First-Class”Construction:From“Evaluation Worship”to“Evaluation Enabling”

第三方评价以其独立性、专业性、公正性等特点在“双一流”建设中得到高度认可,成为“双一流”建设评价的重要组成部分。然而,当前的第三方评价存在着世界一流品质体现度低、社会贡献评价导向性弱、科学性与公正性难保障、促“建”作用发挥不足、支撑动态调整有缺陷等问题,并不能承受其重。未来,在“双一流”建设推进过程中,对待第三方评价的态度应从“评价崇拜”向“评价赋能”进行转变。具体地,要从“存量”和“增量”两个层面推动第三方评价更好地服务和促进“双一流”建设,即一方面要在“双一流”建设中正确认识和规范使用现有第三方评价,另一方面要鼓励发展符合“双一流”建设导向的新型第三方评价。

The third-party evaluation,highly recognized for its independence,professionalism and impartiality,has become an important part of the“double first-class”construction.The current third-party evaluation practice has some problems,such as low comparison with world-class quality,weak evaluation guidance to contributions to the society,difficulty in guaranteeing scientificity and impartiality,insufficient role in promoting the“double first-class”construction,and defects in supporting dynamic adjustment.Therefore,it can hardly bear the expected heavy tasks.This paper suggests that in the future,the attitude towards third-party evaluation should be changed from“evaluation worship”to“evaluation enabling”in the process of“double first-class”construction.Specifically,the third-party evaluation should be pushed forward from the“stock”and“increment”aspects so that it can better serve and promote the“double first-class”construction.That is,on the one hand,we should correctly understand and standardize the application of the existing third-party evaluation system,and on the other hand,we should encourage development of new third-party evaluation system that conforms to the orientation of“double first-class”construction.