基于元分析的图书被引与书评相关性探索

Exploration on the Correlation Between Book Citation and Book Review Based on Meta-Analysis

文章基于143个研究样本,利用元分析方法研究图书被引与书评的相关性。研究结果表明,图书被引与书评具有极低相关关系,与期刊文章相比,书评在一定程度上弥补了图书出版前缺乏同行评议的缺陷,书评指标的引入有望克服引文分析将数据评价结果直接作为科研评价绝对标准的刚性评价缺陷,使读者的意见得到科学共同体的尊重。在传统引文价值备受争议的背景下,书评的上述功能和作用可为图书馆馆藏评价扩展提供契机。提出科学评估,建立致学、致公、致用兼顾的资源评价体系;深度挖掘,营造资源易获得、兴趣可满足、服务可创新的阅读生态;精选整合,提供权威性、学术性、传播性均衡配置的阅读书单等建议。

Based on 143 research samples, this paper uses meta-analysis method to study the correlation between book citation and book review. The results show that there is a very low correlation between book citation and book review, compared with journal articles, book review can make up for the lack of peer review before publication to a certain extent, the introduction of book review indicators is expected to overcome the rigid evaluation defects of citation analysis that directly uses data evaluation results as the absolute standard for scientific research evaluation, and readers’ opinions are respected by the scientific community. Under the controversial background of traditional citation value, the functions of book review can provide an opportunity for the expansion of library collection evaluation. It provides suggestions of scientific evaluation, establishing a resource evaluation system combing learning, publicity, application;deeply excavating, creating a reading ecology with easy access to resources, satisfying interests and innovative services;selected integration, providing a reading list that balanced allocation of authority, academic, and communication, ect.