期刊文献+

基于概念多面描述理论的中学化学课程学科思维方式分布 被引量:1

Distribution of Chemical Thinking in High School Chemistry Curriculums Based on Conceptual Profiles Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 学科思维方式是发展化学学科核心素养的重要抓手。外显我国化学课程内容中所蕴含的学科思维方式是学科核心素养在课堂层面落地的关键环节。概念多面描述理论是国际科学教育近年来新兴的表征思维方式的重要工具。在该理论视域下,研究者们构建了认识物质的6种思维方式。本研究通过质性内容分析,呈现了我国中学化学课程标准中6种思维方式的分布情况。研究结果表明,系统思维在我国中学化学课程标准中占据重要地位,学科思维方式随学段的变化呈现出由感性向理性转变的趋势。 Disciplinary thinking is an important starting point for the development of the core literacy of chemistry. How to show the way of disciplinary thinking contained in the content of chemistry curriculum in our country is the key link for the implementation of the core literacy of the subject at the classroom level. Conceptual profiles theory is an important tool that has emerged in international science education in recent years to represent the way of thinking. Under this theoretical perspective, international science education researchers have constructed six ways of thinking about understanding and analyzing matter. Through qualitative content analysis, this research presents the distribution of six ways of thinking in our country’s middle school chemistry curriculum standards. The research results show that system thinking occupies an important position in the chemistry curriculum standards of middle schools in our country, and the disciplinary thinking mode changes from perceptual to rational with the change of the semester.
作者 迟铭 郑长龙 CHI Ming;ZHENG Chang-Long(Institute of Teacher Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China;Institute of Chemistry Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第1期22-28,共7页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 学科思维方式 概念多面描述理论 物质 课标分析 the way of chemical thinking conceptual profiles theory substance curriculum standards analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1张建伟.概念转变模型及其发展[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(3):34-38. 被引量:51
  • 2钟志贤.如何发展学习者高阶思维能力?[J].远程教育杂志,2005,23(4):78-78. 被引量:168
  • 3Vosniadou S. Conceptual change in Physics science. Learning and Instruction (Special Issue), 1994, 4(1 ): 1-121
  • 4Schnotz W, Vosniadou S, Carretero M. New perspectives on conceptual change. NL: Pergamon, 1999
  • 5Limon M, Mason L. Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. NW: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002
  • 6Posner G J, Strike K A, Hewson P W, et al. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 1982, 66(2): 211-227
  • 7Dreyfus A, Jungwirth E, Eliovitch R. Applying the "cognitive conflict" strategies for conceptual change-some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 1990, 74: 555-569
  • 8Strike K A, Posner G J. A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In: Duschl R A, Hamilton R J, ed. Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. NY: State University of New York Press, 1992, 147-176
  • 9Limon M. On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critlcal appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 2001, 11:357-380
  • 10Lee G, Kwon J, Park S S, et al. Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003, 40(6): 585-603

共引文献143

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部