期刊文献+

当“形”范畴遇到“可供性”概念:一种技术哲学阐释 被引量:1

When the Category of “Natural Shape” Encounters the Concept of “Affordance”: the Illumination on Philosophy of Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “形而上者谓之道,形而下者谓之器”是中国哲学中罕见的直言技术来源的观点之一。“形”范畴作为人参“象”悟“道”、制“器”造“物”的关节点,却未得到更为深入的探究。20世纪初,在人-外部世界界面--这个技术的缘起之地--出现了“可供性”范畴,可供性作为环境中蕴含的行动可能性,表明了物体与其所处环境之间存在着某种互补关系,彰显了“形”范畴的深刻内涵。将“形”作为研究技术起源的逻辑起点,展开对技术本体的哲学追问,不仅可以开辟新的技术哲学追问之路,也将有可能就此开启中西方关于技术的更广泛的、超越各种思维传统的思考与对话。 Chinese philosophy rarely discusses the origin of technology except the phrase“what beyond natural shape is Tao(道),what beneath natural shape is(artifacts).”Traditional philosophy uses natural shape as a medium and demonstrates the essence and relationship between intangible Tao and visible Qi(器).However,the philosophy of natural shape itself and using it as a connection to Tao and Qi are not explicitly discussed.In the early 20th century,at the human-nature interface,where technology originated,the category“affordance”emerged.Affordance refers to the possibility contained in the environment for action and indicates the complimentary relationship between a living being and its environment,which also manifests profound connotations to natural shape.If we assume natural shape as the logical starting point to study the origin of technology,technological ethics,and other issue,it is possible to open the dialogue between China and the West about technology by breaking the boundaries of various disciplines and transcending different kinds of philosophical traditions.
作者 曹东溟 姜小慧 吴俊杰 Cao Dongming;Jiang Xiaohui;Wu Junjie(Research Center for Philosophy of Science and Technology,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110819,China)
出处 《工程研究(跨学科视野中的工程)》 2022年第3期215-224,共10页 JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES
基金 国家社科基金项目“负责任创新(RI)的‘可供性’进路研究”(20BZX040)。
关键词 可供性 技术 环境 老子 natural shape affordance technology environment Laozi
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1叔本华著 陈晓希译.《充足理由律的四重根》[M].商务印书馆,1996年版.第150页.
  • 2The Philosophy of Schopenhauer, By Bryan Magee, Oxford University Press, 1997, P20.
  • 3[3][4][6][14][15]康德著,蓝公武译《纯粹理性批判》,商务印书馆1995年版第40页,第20页,第287页,第222-223页,第314页,第316页.
  • 4[8,12,13,16,21]叔本华著,石冲白译《作为意志与表象的世界》,商务印书馆1995年版第655页,第656页,第165页,第698页,第28页,第562页.
  • 5[10]The World as Will and Representation, By Arthur Schopenhauer, Dover Publication, 1966,Vol. 2, P7, P179.
  • 6[18,19,22]Schopenhauer: Manuscript Remains,Berg Publishers Limited, 1988, Vol. 1, p28.p126. P270. P428.
  • 7吴国盛.芒福德的技术哲学[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(6):30-35. 被引量:43
  • 8Richard Owen,John Bessant,Maggy Heintz. Responsible Inno- vation[M].Chichester, John Wiley&Sons Ltd.Publication,2013xi.
  • 9Luo Lingling,Li Shuang. Theory of Affordance and technology Epistemoloty [EB/OL]. http://www.unipv.it/ webphilos _ lab/ courses/propraS.
  • 10GibsonJ.J.The theory of affordances[Z]//In:Shaw,R.,Bransford, J.,eds.Perceiving,Acting,And Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, (NJInc.), 1977:67.

共引文献28

同被引文献25

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部