无定预期的反意外:以追补性推理构式为例

Counter-mirativity of non-specific expectation:A case study of CAR constructions

追补性推理构式在国内外学界受到广泛重视。鉴于追补性推理构式的推理结构比较特殊,相关研究多从语用量级模型或解-反预期模型展开,但两者都存在可继续深化细化的余地。通过调查极性分布上的差异性,我们发现追补性推理构式存在典型与不典型成员之分,而在语义结构与语用机制的分析中,自明性的彰显与信据力的提升是重要的内在驱动,而两者的实现诉诸无定预期的反意外表达,该手段亦是使用追补性推理构式的充要条件。

Though widely discussed,consequential additional reasoning(CAR)constructions are mostly analyzed under the framework of scalar model or de-counter-expectation model which still requires further research.By investigating the syntactic distribution,this paper argues that CAR constructions have archetypal and peripheral tokens.From the perspectives of semantic and pragmatic performances,the use of CAR constructions is motivated by self-evidence reasoning so as to enhance argumentative strength.To fulfill a reasoning as such,counter-mirativity of non-specific expectation is employed which plays an essential role in the use of CAR constructions.