摘要
《群經平議》是俞樾經學研究的代表作,學者們對此書的評價差别很大。總體來説,批評大於褒獎。我們利用清華簡“書”類文獻相關篇目逐條分析《群經平議》校讀古書的方法與結論,發現俞樾的校讀頗有可取之處,以前學者們對俞樾的批評並不客觀公正,《群經平議》的價值有必要進一步發掘。另外,我們梳理了相關問題的諸家舊説,還從訓詁學角度對相關文句中“德”與“能”的含義作了進一步闡釋。
Qunjing Pingyi(《群經平議》)is Yu Yue(俞樾)’s representative work of the study of Confucian classics.Scholars have very different comments on this book.Overall,the criticism outweighs the praise.By analyzing the methods and conclusions of collating and proofreading the ancient books in Qunjing Pingyi point by point,using the Shangshu-Style documents of Tsinghua bamboo slips,we find that Yu Yue(俞樾)’s works have many merits,and that scholars’previous criticism of Yu Yue(俞樾)was not objective and fair.Therefore,it is necessary to further explore the value of Qunjing Pingyi.In addition,we sort out old ideas of the related issues,and further explain the meanings of De(德)and Neng(能)in the relevant sentences from an exegetic angle.
关键词
出土文獻
俞樾
《群經平議》
平議
闡釋
unearthed documents
Yu Yue(俞樾)
Qunjing Pingyi(《群經平議》)
equitable discussions
interpretation