期刊文献+

中美主要科研资助机构减轻科研项目申报行政负担的对比和启示

Comparison and Enlightenment of Reducing Regulatory Burden of Research Application by Major Funding Agencies in China and United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 以主要科研资助机构为例,比较中美两国在政府、资助机构及研究机构层面形式审查具体政策和举措,提出优化我国项目管理、减轻科研申报行政负担的建议。分析发现,美国联邦政府通过颁布法案和指南,促使资助机构积极响应,建立跨机构的法规适用性保证机制、建立集中的研究者档案数据库、统一和简化项目申请格式和程序;研究机构也为科研人员提供高质量管理服务;我国政府也强调减轻科研人员负担充分释放科技活力,通过扩大无纸化范围、简化填写信息等措施致力于减轻研究者行政负担。为进一步落实科研人员减负的战略任务,可以完善申报系统功能和提示、强化对于科研诚信等核心要素的把控、加强联动改进流程等。 This paper compares the formal examination and measures taken by government,funding agency and host institution between China and United States(US),and puts forward suggestions on optimizing project management and reducing regulatory burden.Result shows that the US government has promoted the active response of funding agencies through promulgation of laws and guidelines,establishing cross-agency regulatory assurance,centralizing investigator database,and unifying application formats and procedures.Host institutions also provide high-quality management services.The Chinese government is also emphasizing reducing the regulatory burden on researchers,as to fully release the vitality of science.Paperless and simplified application has been adopted,contributing to strategic task of reducing regulatory burden.In the future,the improvement of application system,scientific research integrity,process reengineering should be taken into consideration.
作者 殷嘉珺 戴瑞明 罗惠文 庄建辉 Jiajun Yin;Ruiming Dai;Huiwen Luo;Jianhui Zhuang(Department of Scientific Research,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,Shanghai 200032)
出处 《中国科学基金》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期994-999,共6页 Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词 项目申报 形式审查 行政减负 科研资助机构 research application formal examination lighten the regulatory burden funding agency
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄菊芳,胡明铭.减少非学术因素导致的基金项目无效申请[J].中国科学基金,2006,20(5):304-305. 被引量:11
  • 2Office of Management and Budget.Grants Streamlining Activities Under P.L.106-107. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_preamble2 . 2014
  • 3Grants.gov.Grant Application Process. http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/grantapplication-process.html . 2014
  • 4NIH.Overview of Electronic Research Administration (eRA). http://era.nih.gov/about_era/overview_era.cfm . 2013
  • 5NIH.eRA Strategic Plan FY 2013-FY 2017 (Version 4.0)[R/OL]. http://era.nih.gov/files/eRA_Strategic_Plan_2013.docx . 2013
  • 6NIH.Data Collection Site (DCS)Information[R/OL]. http://era.nih.gov/grantees/data_collection_site.cfm . 2013
  • 7NSF.Introduction to FastLane. https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/NSFHelp/flashhelp/fastlane/FastLane_Help/fastlane_help.htm#fastlane_faqs_introduction.htm . 2014
  • 8NSF.Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide,January 2013. https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/NSFHelp/flashhelp/fastlane/FastLane_Help/fastlane_help.htm#fastlane_faqs_introduction.htm . 2014
  • 9刘艳妮,邓军,张都应.国家自然科学基金在“西电”科研和高层次人才培养中发挥重要作用[J].中国科学基金,2009,23(5):313-316. 被引量:8
  • 10王立龙.国家自然科学基金申请书形式审查三级管理体系构建与实施[J].中国科学基金,2009,23(6):366-368. 被引量:9

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部