延续与断裂:明清《合州志》关系述论

Continuation and Rupture:the Relationship of Ming and Qing Dynasties Hezhou Records

清前期的《合州志》版本中,国家图书馆所藏清初《合州志》抄本很可能不是康熙十一年成书的正式的《合州志》版本,而《古今图书集成》中所引用的《合州志》才应是康熙年间正式成书的《合州志》。此外,所谓乾隆初年许元基编的《合州志》抄本也是后人层累构建起来的一个并不存在的版本。清代现存最早且无争议的《合州志》版本为乾隆十三年本,该志与万历《合州志》之间存在一定内容上的联系。这种联系却不为乾隆十三年志的编修者群体所自知,体现出明清《合州志》内容的延续与修志记忆断裂的矛盾统一。

Among different editions of Hezhou Records (合州志) compiled in the early period of the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912),the handwritten copy of Hezhou Records from the beginning years of the dynasty in the collection of the National Library of China was very probably not the formal edition of Hezhou Records completed in the 11th year (1672) of the Kangxi period.The Hezhou Records cited in the Complete Collection of Pictures and Books of Old and Modern Times (gujin tushu jicheng 古今图书集成)was indeed the formal edition.Besides,the so-called handwritten copy of Hezhou Records compiled by Xu Yuanji (许元基) from the early years of the Qianlong period (1736-1796) was a fictitious entity invented cumulatively by later generations.The earliest undisputed Qing Dynasty edition of Hezhou Records now in existence is one compiled in 1748,the 13th year of the Qianlong period.This edition is connected in contents with the edition completed in the Wanli period (1573-1620),which fact,however,was totally unknown to the group of compilers of the 1748 edition.This showcases the contradictory unity of Ming and Qing dynasties Hezhou Records,the contents of which were continued yet the memory of compiling which was ruptured.