期刊文献+

有无Auto flash优化时摆位误差对乳腺癌容积旋转调强放疗计划剂量学的影响

Dosimetric study on positioning error of breast cancer VMAT plan with or without autoflash optimization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨有无Auto flash参与优化时,不同方向的摆位误差对乳腺癌VMAT计划的剂量学影响。方法:选取20例行VMAT技术照射的右侧乳腺癌根治术后患者。Monaco治疗计划系统在优化时可以选择是否对靶区采用Auto flash虚拟外放多叶光栅边界进行优化,对治疗时Auto flash参与优化的计划,制定一个无Auto flash的计划,对于治疗时无Auto flash参与优化的计划,制定一个有Auto flash的计划。2个计划的优化函数和条件均保持一样。对制定好的计划在头脚、上下、左右6个方向上分别引入3 mm和5 mm的摆位误差,重新计算剂量分布,以PTV的V100,D98,D2,Dmean,患侧肺的V20、V5,健侧肺的V5,脊髓的Dmax以及心脏的Dmean的变化幅度评价治疗计划对摆位误差的敏感性。结果:对3 mm的摆位误差,有Auto flash优化的VMAT计划在任一方向上PTV的剂量偏差均小于5%,无Auto flash优化的VMAT计划在下方向上的PTV剂量偏差大于5%,其余均小于5%。对5 mm的摆位误差,有Auto flash优化的VMAT计划在左和下方向的PTV剂量偏差大于5%,其余均小于5%,无Auto flash优化的VMAT计划在左和下方向的PTV剂量偏差大于5%,其余均小于5%。但就偏差的幅度而言,有Auto flash的计划小于无Auto flash的计划。结论:有Auto flash的计划,在有摆位误差时剂量学差异小于无Auto flash的计划,在制定乳腺癌计划时应该采用Auto flash参与优化。两种计划均在内、上、前这三个方向上剂量学偏差最小,外、下、后三个方向上剂量学偏差最大,在摆位时更应该刻意关注。 Objective:To investigate the dosimetric effect of setting errors in different directions on the breast cancer VMAT plan when Autoflash is involved in optimization.Methods:Selected 20 patients after radical mastectomy of breast cancer who underwent VMAT technology irradiation in our hospital.The Monaco treatment planning system can choose whether to use Autoflash virtual external MLC boundary to optimize the target area during optimization,and develop a plan without Autoflash during treatment.Make a plan without Autoflash for the plan with Autoflash participating in optimization during the treatment,and vice versa.The optimization functions and conditions of the two plans remain the same.Introduce the positioning error of 3mm and 5mm in the six directions of head,foot,up and down,and left and right respectively for the prepared plan,and recalculate the dose distribution,using V100,D98,D2,Dmean of PTV,and V20,V5 of the affected lung./Dmean,the V5 and Dmean of the contralateral lung,the Dmax of the spinal cord,and the Dmean of the heart change the range to evaluate the sensitivity of the treatment plan to setup errors.Results:for 3mm setup error,the dose deviation of PTV was less than 5%for Auto flash-optimized VMAT in either direction,and more than 5%for non-Auto flash-optimized VMAT in the lower direction,the rest were less than 5%.For the setting error of 5 mm,the dose deviation of PTV in the left and lower directions of VMAT plan optimized by Auto flash is more than 5%,and the rest is less than 5%,no Auto flash optimization of the VMAT plan in the left and lower direction of the PTV dose deviation of more than 5%,the rest are less than 5%.However,in terms of the magnitude of deviation,plans with Auto flash are smaller than those without Auto flash.Conclusion:the plan with Autoflash,the dosimetric difference is smaller than the plan without Autoflash when there is a setup error,and Autoflash should be used to participate in the optimization when formulating the breast cancer plan.Both plans have the least sensitivity in the inner,upper,and first directions,and the most sensitive in the outer,lower,and rear directions,and they should be deliberately paid attention to when setting up positions.
作者 程秀艳 葛红 CHENG Xiuyan;GE Hong(The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University&Henan Cancer Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008,China)
出处 《包头医学院学报》 CAS 2023年第3期74-79,共6页 Journal of Baotou Medical College
关键词 乳腺癌 VMAT Auto flash 摆位误差 剂量学 Breast cancer VMAT Autoflash Setup errors Effective
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1许峰,柏森,王瑾,张洪,钟仁明,蒋晓芹.用锥形束CT图像测量放疗摆位误差[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(6):461-464. 被引量:60
  • 2Ahmad S, Vlachaki MT, Teslow TN, et al. Impact of setup uncertainty in the dosimetry of prostate and surrounding tissues in prostate cancer patient treated with peacock/IMRT [J]. Med Dosim,2005,30 : 1-7.
  • 3Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Wu Q, et al. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005 ,63 :422-33.
  • 4Hong TS, Tom WA, Chappell R J, et al. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiationtherapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,61:779-788.
  • 5Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT:report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [ J ]. Med Phys, 2003,30 : 2089 -2115.
  • 6Dong L, Antolak J, Salehpour M, et al. Patient-specific point dose measurement for IMRT monitor unit verification [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56:867-877.
  • 7Dische S, Saunders MI, Williams C, et al. Precision in reporting the dose given in a course of radiotherapy [ J]. Radiother Oncol, 1993,29:287-293.
  • 8沈君姝,朱锡旭,李兵,翟振宇,张宜勤.鼻咽癌调强放疗中摆位误差对物理剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2008,25(2):552-554. 被引量:13
  • 9王鑫,胡超苏,应红梅,朱国培,何少琴.摆位系统误差对鼻咽癌放疗剂量分布的影响[J].中国癌症杂志,2008,18(8):620-625. 被引量:55
  • 10石锦平,谢秋英,张利文,何燕燕.鼻咽癌调强放疗摆位误差对剂量分布影响的研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2010,25(4):394-396. 被引量:11

共引文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部