期刊文献+

消费者权力感对混合情绪广告分享意愿的影响 被引量:1

Effect of Consumer's Sense of Power on the Willingness to Share of Mixed Emotion Advertising
下载PDF
导出
摘要 混合情绪广告作为情绪营销的重要构成要素,已成为众多商家通过社交媒体平台扩大品牌影响力和提升传播效果的手段之一。本文基于信息处理理论,探究消费者权力感对混合情绪广告分享意愿的影响及其内在机制。研究发现:高权力感(vs.低权力感)个体在面对混合情绪广告时,态度更好,分享意愿更高;情绪不适感在此起中介作用。本研究不仅丰富了混合情绪广告和权力感的研究文献,并为广告商针对不同特质消费者进行个性化广告推送提供了有效的理论借鉴。 As an important component of emotional marketing,mixed emotion advertising has become one of the means for many businesses to expand brand influence and enhance communication effectiveness through social media platforms.Based on the theory of information processing,this article explores the influence of consumers'sense of power on mixed emotion advertising attitudes and willingness to share and its internal mechanism.The research found that users with a high sense of power(vs.high sense of power)have better attitudes and greater willingness to share when facing mixed-emotion ads.Emotional discomfort plays an intermediary role here.This research not only enriches the research literature of mixed emotion advertising and sense of power,but also provides an effective theoretical reference for advertisers by pushing personalized advertisements for users with different characteristics.
作者 姚琦 周赟 贺钟祥 吴章建 Yao Qi;Zhou Yun;He Zhongxiang;Wu Zhangjian(School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing,400074;School of Tourism and Media,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing,400074;School of Business,Nankai University,Tianjing,30071)
出处 《珞珈管理评论》 2022年第6期154-170,共17页 Luojia Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“权力感对消费者决策方式及产品选择的影响机制研究:情感-认知系统响应视角”(项目批准号:71772021) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“消费者对AI机器人使用意愿的影响因素及作用机制研究:‘信用-体验’服务差异视角”(项目批准号:72172021)
关键词 信息处理 权力感 混合情绪广告 广告态度 分享意愿 Information processing Sense of power Mixed emotion advertising Advertising attitude Willingness to share
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1李虹.自我超越生命意义对压力和健康关系的调节作用[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):422-427. 被引量:138
  • 2Derek D. Rucker,Adam D. Galinsky.Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.2009(3)
  • 3Kristopher J. Preacher,Derek D. Rucker,Andrew F. Hayes.Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions[J].Multivariate Behavioral Research.2007(1)
  • 4Derek D. Rucker,Adam D. Galinsky,David Dubois.Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology.2011(3)
  • 5Pamela K. Smith,John T. Jost,Ranjini Vijay.Legitimacy Crisis? Behavioral Approach and Inhibition When Power Differences are Left Unexplained[J].Social Justice Research.2008(3)
  • 6Karen P.Leith,Roy F.Baumeister.Empathy, Shame, Guilt, and Narratives of Interpersonal Conflicts: Guilt‐Prone People Are Better at Perspective Taking[J].Journal of Personality.2008(1)
  • 7Pat Auger,Timothy M. Devinney,Jordan J. Louviere,Paul F. Burke.Do social product features have value to consumers?[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing.2008(3)
  • 8Dacher Keltner,Gerben A. Van Kleef,Serena Chen,Michael W. Kraus.A Reciprocal Influence Model of Social Power: Emerging Principles and Lines of Inquiry[J].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.2008
  • 9Pat Auger,Timothy M. Devinney.Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions[J].Journal of Business Ethics.2007(4)
  • 10Jennifer R. Overbeck,Bernadette Park.Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.2005(2)

共引文献213

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部