芝诺悖论,海德格尔与西方形而上学中“存在与时间”问题的开端

Zeno Paradoxes, Heidegger and the Beginning of the Problem of “Being” and“Time” in the Western Metaphysics

从海德格尔对时间问题的思考出发,本文对芝诺悖论给出了一个不同于以往形而上学的时间论解释。这一时间论解释试图说明,从巴门尼德与芝诺开始的关于存在与运动的思考,尤其是著名的芝诺悖论,在何种意义上开启了后世西方形而上学关于存在与时间问题之思考正统的“开端”,以及这一正统的开端又在何种意义上“遗忘”和“遮蔽”了关于“存在”与“时间”的源初问题。

People often trace the philosophical study of“being”and“time”in Western philosophy to Plato and Aristotle.In light of Heidegger's investigation of“time”and“being”,the essay re-exams Parmenides's theses of being and Zeno's four paradoxes of motion and their ontological implications of temporality.The examination will show why and how the traditional interpretation of Parmenides and Zeno triggered“the first beginning”of the western thought of“being”and“time”and thus,started the history of“forgetting”the original question of being and time itself.