期刊文献+

非常规就业、劳动力市场二元化与社会保障制度的重新定位——向“后工业社会”转型中的欧洲社会保障制度 被引量:3

Non-standard Employment,Labor Market Dualization and the Changing Role of Social Security—European Social Security Systems in the Transformation into a Post-Industrial Society
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代以来,欧洲劳动力市场灵活化持续发展,非常规就业不断增长,这种变化发生在欧洲向“后工业社会”转型的过程中。非常规就业的增长是充分就业在欧洲终结的结果之一,与欧洲国家应对就业问题的社会政策改革紧密相关。尤其是在欧洲大陆国家,渐进的社会保障制度改革起到了保护核心劳动力和维持欧洲经济竞争力的作用,但同时带来劳动力市场二元化的结果。新冠肺炎疫情暴发之前,欧洲国家采取了一些措施,试图解决非常规就业者社会保障不足的问题,但并未从根本上改变劳动力市场和社会保障制度的二元结构。新冠肺炎疫情之下,欧洲应对新冠危机的举措优先保护常规就业,进一步强化了核心和边缘劳动者之间的社会分化。 The labor market flexibilization began in Europe in the 1980s,the development of which coincided with the transformation of Europe into a “ post-industrial” era.As a major change,the increase of non-standard employment,which is the result of the end of full employment in Europe,demands reforming the social protection as well as labor market systems.Meanwhile,the reforming measures may also have contributed to the further increase of non-standard employment.As illustrated by that in the continental European countries,the gradual reform of the social security systems leads to strengthened protection of the core labor force as well as the sustained economic competitiveness in Europe,which thus caused the dualization of the labor market.Before the COVID-19 pandemic,some European countries made efforts to expand the coverage of social insurance to include non-standard employees.Nonetheless,the dualism of both the labor market and the social security systems was maintained.During the COVID-19 pandemic,measures like “ short-time work”schemes have further strengthened the social division between core and marginal workforce.
作者 张浚 ZHANG Jun
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第6期131-158,I0005,共29页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1夏晓文.浅析德国劳动力市场状况和就业政策改革[J].德国研究,2005,20(4):39-43. 被引量:8
  • 2丁纯:“90年代以来德国的失业状况及对策初探”,第31—35页
  • 3张文红:“福利改革:对德国社会民主党执政能力的考验”,中国劳动和社会保障法律网,http://www.cnlsslaw.com/list.asp?Unid=1558,2006年11月5日访问.
  • 4Werner Eichhorst and Kutz Kaiser,“The German Labor Market: Still Adjusting Badly?”, http://ftp.iza. org/dp2215.pdf.IZA Discussion Paper 2215,2006年10月10日访问
  • 5Achim Kemmerling and Oliver Bruttel," New Politics in German Labour Market Policy? The Implications of the Recent Hartz Reforms for the German Welfare State", Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung (WZB) discussion paper, February 2005 ISSN, Nr. 1011-9523
  • 6Lena Jacobi and Jochen Kluve,“Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany”, IZA discussion paper,No. 2100, April 2006.
  • 7“OECD preliminary outlook 2007 : Germany”.
  • 8Irene Dingeldey,“Hartz IV in Context: the German Way to Employability” ,http://www.apsoc.ox. ac.uk/Espanet/espanetconference/papers/ppr. 11A. ID. pdf. pdf,牛津大学社会政策与社会工作系网站,2006年10月31日
  • 9Viktor Steiner,“enkung der Arbeitslosenuntersutzung: Weniger Arbeitslosigkeit, mehr Effizienz”, DIW Wochenbericht, Nr. 25/2003, S. 401-408
  • 10Viktor Steiner, “Social Welfare Reform and the Low-wage Labor Market in Germany: What Works, and What doesn't?”, 2004, http ://www. zew. de/en/publikationen/dfgflex/paperSteiner2.pdf, 2006年10月31日访问

共引文献36

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部