中文版接纳承诺疗法综合评估问卷在大学生群体中的修订及信效度检验

Revision and Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes(CompACT) in College Students

目的:检验中文版接纳承诺疗法综合评估问卷(CompACT)在大学生中的信效度。方法:在大学生群体中收集有效数据1077份,其中531人同时完成中文版CompACT以及生活满意度量表(SWLS)、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS-21)、接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)、认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F)、正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)等效标问卷,546人只填写中文版CompACT,并于三周后收集有效重测问卷200份。结果:探索性因素分析提取开放、觉察和行动3个因子,共18条目;验证性因素分析表明,3因子结构拟合良好(χ^(2)=279.96, df=120, CFI=0.923, TLI=0.904, RMSEA=0.051, SRMR=0.061),且中文版CompACT具备跨性别测量严格等值、跨年级的测量强等值性。中文版CompACT及其各维度与生活满意度显著正相关(0.16~0.52),与负性情绪(抑郁、焦虑、压力)显著负相关(r=-0.18~-0.53),与经验回避(r=-0.32~-0.59)、认知融合(r=-0.29~-0.57)显著负相关,与正念显著正相关(r=0.10~0.57)。中文版CompACT及开放、觉察和行动3个维度的Cronbach α系数分别为0.87、0.81、0.87和0.90,三周后的重测信度(ICC)分别为0.64、0.63、0.72和0.76。结论:中文版接纳承诺疗法综合评估问卷(CompACT)在大学生中具有良好的信效度。

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CompACT in college students.Methods: Totally 1077 colleges students were assessed with the CompACT, of which 531 individuals were asked to complete the validity questionnaire at the same time. After 3 weeks, 200 participates filled in the CompACT to assess the testretest reliability. Results: The exploratory factor analysis showed that the CompACT consisted of 3 factors, with a total of18 items;The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 3-factor structure fitted well(χ^(2)=279.96, df=120, CFI=0.923,TLI=0.904, RMSEA=0.051, SRMR=0.061). According to the testing of the measurement invariance, the configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance and strict invariance of the 3-factor model CompACT across gender were acceptable. And only the configural invariance, metric invariance and scalar invariance of the 3-factor model CompACT across grade were acceptable. CompACT and its dimensions were significantly positively correlated with satisfaction with life(r=0.16~0.52), significantly negatively correlated with negative emotions(r=-0.18~-0.53), significantly negatively correlated with empirical avoidance(r=-0.32~-0.59) and cognitive fusion(r=-0.29~-0.57), and significantly positively related to mindfulness(r=0.10~0.57). The Cronbach α coefficients of the CompACT and it’s 3 factors were 0.87、0.81、0.87 and 0.90, and the test-retest reliability(ICC) was 0.64、0.63、0.72 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of CompACT has good reliability and validity in college students.