期刊文献+

考虑碳税政策下供应链的减排决策分析

Analysis of Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decision Under Carbon Tax Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究碳税政策下基于制造商、零售商、消费者构成的供应链系统减排策略选择分析,考虑在碳税影响下建立制造商进行减排技术投入、再制造技术两种减排决策模型,基于Stackelberg博弈理论,运用逆向求解法对减排成本系数、再制造投入技术系数进行分析,最后运用Matlab2016进行模型数值仿真。结果表明,政府实施碳税政策能够减少企业的碳排量,但是同时也会相应降低企业利润;减排技术的投入对企业碳排放起到抑制作用,但是对企业利润有负向影响;再制造成本的投入可以减少碳排放,同时如果在较为合理的碳税下,也可以对企业的利润起到正向作用。回收价格对制造商利润和零售商利润、碳排放量有负向影响。 This paper studies the selection and analysis of emission reduction strategies in the supply chain system composed of manufacturers,retailers and consumers under the carbon tax policy.Two emission reduction decision models of manufacturers’emission reduction technology input and remanufacturing technology were established under the influence of carbon tax.Based on Stackelberg game theory,the inverse solution method was used to analyze the emission reduction cost coefficient and remanufacturing input technology coefficient.Finally,Matlab2016 is used to conduct numerical simulation of the model.The results show that the carbon tax policy implemented by the government can reduce the carbon emission of enterprises,but also reduce the corresponding profits of enterprises;the investment of emission reduction technology can restrain the carbon emission of enterprises,but has a negative impact on the profits of enterprises;the input of remanufacturing costs can reduce carbon emissions,and under a more reasonable carbon tax,it can also play a positive role in the profits of enterprises.The recovery price has a negative influence on manufacturer’s profit,retailer’s profit and carbon emission.
作者 衣珊珊 陈湉 YI Shan-shan;CHEN Tian(School of Business,Fuzhou Institute of Technology,Fuzhou 350599,China)
出处 《长春师范大学学报》 2023年第2期114-122,共9页 Journal of Changchun Normal University
基金 福州理工学院科研基金项目“基于碳排放权分配的供应链减排路径研究”(FTKY2022026) 福建省社会科学基金项目“平台经济下快递从业人员劳动权益保护研究”(FJ2021B141)。
关键词 碳税 供应链 再制造投入技术 减排技术 carbon tax supply chain remanufacturing input technology emission reduction technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献81

  • 1赵道致,王楚格.考虑低碳政策的供应链企业减排决策研究[J].工业工程,2014,17(1):105-111. 被引量:19
  • 2Benjaafar S, Li Y Z, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models [ J ] Working paper, 2010. http://www, ie. umn. edu/faculty/facuhy/pdf/beyada-3-31-10.
  • 3Chen X, Benjaafar S, Elomri A. The carbon-constrained E OQ[ J]. Operations Research Letters, 2013, 41 (2) : I72-I79.
  • 4Keskin N, Plambeck E. Greenhouse gas emissions accounting: allocating emissions from processes to co-products [ J ] Working Paper, 2011, Available at SSRN 1956211.
  • 5Caro F, Corbett C ], Tan T, Zuidwijk R. Carbon-optimal and carbon-neutral supply chains [ J ]. Working paper, 2011 htto ://escholarshio. or:/uc/item/3s01 b6o,,.
  • 6Bin S, Dowlatabadi H. Consumer life style approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions L J J. Energy r'ohcy, 2005, 33(2) : 197 -208.
  • 7Wei Y M, Liu L C, Fan Y, Wu G. The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis of China' s residents[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35( 1 ) : 247-257.
  • 8Fei L, Dong S, Xue L, Liang Q, Yang W. Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2) : 568-574.
  • 9Brannlund R, Ghalwasha T, Nordstr:ma J. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions[J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 29(1) : 1-17.
  • 10Jeuland A P, Shugan S M. Managing channel profits[ J]. Marketing Science, 1983, 2(3) : 239-272.

共引文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部