期刊文献+

共享单车影响下接驳公交线路设计与车辆配置方法 被引量:7

Feeder Bus Route Design and Vehicle Allocation Under Influence of Shared Bikes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对轨道交通的“第一/最后一公里”问题,接驳公交和共享单车是通勤用户最常选择的两种公共交通方式。为理解共享单车对接驳公交出行需求和线路设计等规划运营方面的影响,提出供需交互状态下的接驳公交线路设计与车辆配置模型。需求端考虑出行时间和出行费用,基于用户在共享单车和接驳公交之间的模式选择行为,动态计算接驳公交实际出行需求;供应端考虑车辆容量、数量和流平衡约束,以最小化公交运营成本和用户出行成本之和为目标,建立混合整数非线性规划模型,优化接驳公交线路设计及车辆配置。模型采用拉格朗日松弛算法进行求解。该方法应用于北京市回龙观地铁站周边出行小区接驳公交线路设计,公交及单车出行需求采用真实的IC卡数据,以及摩拜单车骑行数据,站点间行驶时长采用高德驾车路径规划API(Application Programming Interface)数据。实验结果表明,车辆总数为10,线路数量为2时,考虑共享单车影响的接驳公交规划模型相较于只考虑单一模式可以有效避免规划需求误差。此时,各站点到地铁站的平均运行时间是15.58 min,乘客平均等待时间是3.35 min;在线路数量为4时,各站点到地铁站的平均运行时间为8.53 min,几乎减少了50%,乘客平均等待时间为3.44 min。然而,随着线路数量的增加,模型计算时间会呈指数级增长。因此,从模型计算时效性角度,线路数量设置为2或3时,均可满足0.5 h更新一次线路的应用需求。 For the"first-and last-mile"of rail transit,feeder buses and shared bikes are two most prevalent modes to provide connection with rail transit for commuters.To understand the impact of bike-sharing on the planning and operation of feeder bus travel demand and route design,this study examines the feeder bus route design and vehicle allocation challenges based on the interaction of demand and supply.From the demand side,the actual travel demand of feeder buses is dynamically estimated depending on the user’s mode choice between shared bikes and feeder buses,considering the travel time and travel cost.Comparatively,a mixed-integer non-linear programming model with the objective of minimizing the sum of bus operating cost and user travel cost is developed from the supply perspective to optimize the bus route design and vehicle allocation,including vehicle capacity,vehicle quantity,and flow balance constraints.The Lagrangian relaxation algorithm is used to solve the model.This strategy is applied to the planning of feeder bus routes in the Beijing suburbs surrounding the Huilongguan Metro Station.The actual smart card data and Mobike cycling data are used to obtain the total travel demand.The travel time by various modes between stops is derived from the AutoNavi route planning API(Application Programming Interface).In the case where the total number of vehicles is 10 and the number of lines is 2,the experimental results show that the difference between the assumed bus travel demand and the computed bus ridership can be effectively avoided if the influence of bike-sharing on bus travel demand is considered.The average running time between each bus stop and the station is 15.58 minutes,while the average passenger waiting time is 3.35 minutes.In the case where there are four lines,the average running time from each bus stop to the station is 8.53 minutes,which is almost half of the case with only two lines;the average waiting time for passengers is 3.44 minutes.Nonetheless,the computing time for the model grows exponentially with the increasing of the number of lines.Consequently,from the perspective of model calculation efficiency,both scenarios in which the number of lines is set to 2 or 3 can satisfy the application requirement of updating lines every half hour.
作者 刘路美 刘钲可 马昌喜 谭二龙 马晓磊 LIU Lu-mei;LIU Zheng-ke;MAChang-xi;TAN Er-long;MAXiao-lei(School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China;School of Traffic and Transportation,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou 730070,China)
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期165-175,共11页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家重点研发计划(2021YFB1600100) 北京市自然科学基金(8212010)。
关键词 交通工程 线路设计 车辆配置 混合整数非线性规划 接驳公交 共享单车 traffic engineering route design vehicle allocation mixed-integer nonlinear programming feeder bus shared bikes
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1孙焰,施其洲,赵源,孔庆瑜.城市轨道交通列车开行方案的确定[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(8):1005-1008. 被引量:34
  • 2徐瑞华,陈菁菁,杜世敏.城轨交通多种列车交路模式下的通过能力和车底运用研究[J].铁道学报,2005,27(4):6-10. 被引量:53
  • 3徐锦帆,梁广深.地铁列车编组分期实施的合理性及扩编的可行性[J].都市快轨交通,2007,20(2):1-5. 被引量:18
  • 4Chang S K, Schonfeld P M. Multiple period optimization of bus transit systems [ J ]. Transportation Research, 1991, 25B: 453-478.
  • 5Chien S, Schonfeld P M. Optimization of grid transit system in heterogeneous urban environment [ J ]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1997,123 ( 1 ) : 28 -35.
  • 6Chien S I, Spasovic L N, Elefsiniotis S S, et al. Evaluation of feeder bus systems with probabilistic time-varying demands and non-additive time costs [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 2001, 1760: 47-55.
  • 7Chang S K J, Lee C J. Welfare comparison of fixed- and flexible-route bus systems [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 1993, 1390: 16-22.
  • 8Chang S K, Yu W J. Comparison of subsidized fixed- and flexible-route bus system [ J ]. Transportation Research Record, 1996, 1557:15 - 20.
  • 9Chien S. Optimization of headway, vehicle size and route choice for minimum cost feeder service [ J ]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2005, 28: 359-380.
  • 10Chien S, Yang Z, Hou E. Genetic algorithm approach for transit route planning and design [ J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127: 200-207.

共引文献62

同被引文献43

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部