期刊文献+

认真地对待秋审——传统中国司法“正当程序”的新诠释 被引量:3

Taking Autumn Assizes Seriously: A New Interpretation of “Due Process” in Chinese Traditional Judiciary
原文传递
导出
摘要 Derk Bodde和Clarence Morris认为秋审是一种不同于西方的“正当程序”的命题,具有丰富的诠释空间。从宪制意义上看,通过秋审,中央与地方之间建立起了更加紧密的联系,一方面可以促进全国司法的统一适用,另一方面得以改变律典确定法定刑主义带来的量刑僵化的弊端。在秋审中,刑部与各省之间不同于常规的审级关系,通过秋审各种《不符册》可以发现,刑部对于各省的不同意见,常采取“内商”的方式更加谨慎地处理,改判率并不算高。在刑部内部的会议上,既尊重当家堂官的意见,在决策时亦有民主的色彩,保持了一种权威与民主的平衡。 Derk Bodde and Clarence Morris believe that Autumn Assizes are different from Western “due process”, which can be interpreted further. From the perspective of constitutional significance, the central government and local government build closer relationships by the way of Autumn Assizes. On one hand, it can benefit the uniform application of the judiciary, and on the other hand, it may overcome the problem of sentencing rigidity caused by statutory sentence doctrine. The relationship between the Board of Punishment(Xingbu) and provinces is different from the conventional relationship between trial levels in light of Autumn Assizes. According to Bufuce, the Board of Punishment(Xingbu) takes the different opinions of provinces cautiously through internal negotiations, and thus the rate of changing the original sentence is not high. In the inner meeting held by the Board of Punishment(Xingbu), they respect the opinion of the senior official in charge and reach the final decision in a democratic way,which keeps the balance between authority and democracy.
作者 陈新宇 CHEN Xinyu
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 CSSCI 2023年第1期151-163,共13页 Journal Of CUPL
关键词 秋审 正当程序 《不符册》 Autumn Assizes due process Bufuce
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献5

  • 1《光绪宣统两朝上谕档》,广西师范大学出版社,1996年.
  • 2清·朱寿鹏.《光绪朝东华录》,中华书局1958年版.
  • 3清·赵尔巽.《清史稿》,中华书局1977年版.
  • 4清·祝庆祺,鲍书芸,潘文舫.《刑案汇览三编》,北京古籍出版社2000年版.
  • 5(美)布迪(Bodde,Derk),(美)莫里斯(Morris,Clarence)著,朱勇.中华帝国的法律[M]江苏人民出版社,1993.

共引文献9

同被引文献22

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部