期刊文献+

自动驾驶时代基于地铁定价策略的多模式通勤出行管理

Managing Multi-Mode Commuting Based on Transit Pricing Strategy in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles
原文传递
导出
摘要 多模式交通系统的优化管理研究是交通领域的经典问题.文章结合自动驾驶时代背景,构建高速瓶颈公路传统汽车和共享自动驾驶汽车,以及独立地铁线路组成的多模式竞争交通模型,研究不同地铁定价策略(如地铁边际成本,平均成本,总社会成本最优以及考虑道路收费时受补贴的地铁边际成本定价)对共享自动驾驶汽车市场渗透率,出行模式划分以及总社会成本的影响.结果表明:随地铁定价策略变化,独驾传统汽车的通勤者数量未受影响,共享自动驾驶汽车和地铁的通勤者数量变化不唯一;当满足某个特定条件时,总社会成本最优定价在引导地铁出行,缓解道路拥堵,降低通勤者个体出行成本和总社会成本等方面具有最佳效果;而提高地铁运营的边际成本,受补贴的地铁边际成本定价将实现总社会成本最优.文章从不同视角为政府制定多目标和弹性的交通政策提供参考. Optimal management on the multi-mode traffic system is the classic problem in transportation field.Combining the background of the autonomous era,this paper formulates a multi-modal competitive transportation model consisting of the regular vehicles(RVs) and shared autonomous vehicles(SAVs) on a bottleneckconstrained highway and a separate transit line,then investigates the impact of diverse strategies of transit pricing(e.g.,marginal cost pricing,average cost pricing,optimal total social cost pricing,and subsidized marginal cost pricing from road tolling) on the penetration rate for SAVs,the modal split pattern,and the total social costs.The results show that:the number of commuters for RVs is not affected,while the number of commuters for SAVs and transit is not unique with the change of different transit pricing;when some condition is satisfied,optimal total social cost pricing has the best effect in guiding commuters to choose the transit mode,alleviating road congestion,and reducing individual travel cost and total social cost;however,with the marginal cost further improved,the subsidized marginal cost pricing from road tolling will achieve the minimal total social cost.This paper provides reference for the government to formulate multi-objective and flexible traffic policies from different perspectives.
作者 汤喆轶 田丽君 TANG Zheyi;TIAN Lijun(School of Economic and Management,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116)
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第12期3201-3212,共12页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 福建省自然科学基金重点项目(2022J02014)资助课题。
关键词 城市交通 瓶颈模型 共享自动驾驶 多模式出行 地铁定价 Urban traffic bottleneck model shared autonomous vehicles multi-modal travel transit pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘天亮,欧阳恋群,黄海军.ATIS作用下的混合交通行为网络与效率损失上界[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):154-159. 被引量:23
  • 2黄海军,Int J of Transportation Research Part E,1998年
  • 3黄海军,Optimal Control Applications & Methods,1997年
  • 4黄海军,Transportation and Traffic Theory,1996年,479页
  • 5Walters A A. The theory and measurement of private and social costs of highway congestion[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1998, 69: 102-183.
  • 6Button K J. Road pricing[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 1986, V20: 85-184.
  • 7Tabuchi T. Bottleneck congestion and modal split[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1993, 34: 414-431.
  • 8Huang H J. Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: The case with two groups of commuters[J]. Transportation Research part E, 2000, 36(4): 267-284.
  • 9Eliasson J, Mattsson L G. Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2006, 40(7): 602-620.
  • 10Maruyama T, Sumalee A. Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2007, 41(7): 655-671.

共引文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部