“闲话”与“并非闲话”之间——重审“语丝派”与“现代评论派”论争的发生

Between “Xian Hua” and “Bing Fei Xian Hua”——The Occurrence of the Debate between the Yusi School and the Modern Review School

《闲话》与《并非闲话》的发表,打响了陈西滢与周氏兄弟间的笔战,拉开了“现代评论派”与“语丝派”论战的帷幕“。女师大风潮”作为“闲话”事端的背景却并非论战发生的主要原因,其背后派系势力的缠斗更为重要;随着风潮运动从“驱杨”转向“倒章”,论战从周陈之争升级为两个集体间的对峙,体现出双方自觉的社团意识及对舆论话语权的激烈竞争。鲁迅与周作人成为论战的“先锋”并不是其个体性被派系势力和社团归属所湮没,只是大环境中的个人在各种机缘下产生了恰与某集体价值合拍的私人化情绪,个体声音与集体力量相互借势针对同一目标时,便产生了“代言人”的效果。种种非文化因素的干扰介入使“语丝派”与“现代评论派”之论争溢出了文化场的“是非”逻辑,隐现着后五四时代文化生态的危机。

The publication of Xian Hua and Bing Fei Xian Hua started a pen battle between Chen Xiying and the Zhou Brothers,and also opened the curtain of the debate between the Yusi School and the Modern Review School. As the background of the“Xian Hua”incident,the“Student strike of women’s Normal University”is not the main reason for the debate. The struggle of factional forces behind it is more important. When the student movement changed from“expelling Principal Yang”to“expelling Minister of Zhang”,the debate escalated to a confrontation between the two collectives,reflecting the conscious community consciousness of both sides and the fierce competition for the discourse power of public opinion. Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren became the“vanguard”of the debate not because they have been obliterated by powerful factional forces or sense of community belonging,but because individuals in the general environment have generated private emotions that coincide with a collective value under various opportunities.When individual voices and collective forces take advantage of each other to target the same goal,they have the effect of“spokesperson”. The interference of various non-cultural factors makes the debate between the Yusi School and the Modern Review School overflow the“right and wrong”logic of the cultural field,it looms the crisis of cultural ecology in the Post-May 4th.