期刊文献+

价值观教育国际比较的立场、范式与难题——以东北师范大学“全球价值观教育调查”为例 被引量:5

Standpoints, Paradigms and Challenges of International Comparisons in Values Education: Taking the International Values Education Survey Conducted by Northeast Normal University as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 价值观教育国际比较是因应经济全球化发展而产生的研究领域,在理论立场、方法范式、发展向度等方面存在诸多亟待探讨的问题。深入推进价值观教育国际比较,须超越自我与他者两极对立的思维方式,确立以我为主、以人度人、人我互动的理论立场,在合理保持主体性自觉的前提下,做到“真实认识他者与认识他者真实”的统一,探寻价值观教育发展的普遍规律与中国之道;吸收借鉴跨文化比较研究方法论,探索以描述性比较为基础、以分析性比较为中介、以解释性比较为目标的方法范式;更加聚焦“因果解释”这个突出难题,遵循有限归纳与理论演绎相结合的辩证逻辑,综合推进横纵两个方向上的因果分析。 The international comparison in values education is a research field arising from the globalization in economic development.There are many issues that need to be discussed urgently in terms of theoretical standpoints, methodological paradigms and directions in development.For further reinforcing the international comparison in values education, we must go beyond the binary thinking in self and others, and establish a theoretical standpoint of self-orientation, understanding of others and mutual interaction, achieve the unity of subjective and objective truth about others, and explore the universal law of the values development in education and its Chinese way on the basis of maintaining a reasonable self-awareness.We should draw on cross-cultural methodology and establish a methodological paradigm based on the descriptive comparison, mediated by analytical comparison, and aimed at interpretive comparison.Besides, we should also focus more on the challenge of “causal interpretation”,follow the dialectical logic of integrating limited induction and theoretical deduction, and comprehensively promote causal analysis in both horizontal and vertical dimensions.
作者 任志锋 REN Zhi-feng(Center for Ideological and Political Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2023年第2期50-55,共6页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BKS054)。
关键词 价值观教育 跨文化研究 比较方法论 因果解释 Values Education Cross-cultural Study Comparative Methodology Causal Interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献56

同被引文献43

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部