期刊文献+

水平差异、垂直差异、外部信息获取与消费者购买行为 被引量:5

Horizontal Differentiation,Vertical Differentiation,External Information Acquisition and Consumer Buying Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用新实证产业组织理论模型(N EIO)验证了企业产品战略当中一个长期争议的问题:企业产品差异化战略究竟会促进消费者购买行为还是抑制消费者购买行为?在利用新实证产业组织的理论框架将产品差异区分为水平差异与垂直差异之后,随机参数离散选择模型给出了稳健的计量结果:基于“水平差异化”的产品差异化策略对于消费者购买行为具有显著的促进作用;基于“垂直差异化”的产品差异化策略对于消费者购买行为具有抑制作用。此前对产品差异化问题的实证研究之所以出现争议,是未能有效区分产品差异的不同类型。此外,通过外部信息获取,“垂直差异化”对消费者购买行为的抑制作用可以得到一定程度的控制。本文的理论和实证结果明确了之前关于产品差异化效果的实证研究出现矛盾结论的重要原因,具有较大的理论价值,并为企业制定有效的产品竞争战略、合理构建差异化产品组合提供了重要的参考依据。 Product differentiation strategies are an important part of firm competition strategy. However, the effect of product differentiation strategies is controversial. In some real-life cases, product differentiation promotes consumer buying behavior, but in others,it inhibits it. Although some scholars have provided independent theoretical explanations, their theories fail to explain why product differentiation strategies have opposing effects in different situations, which further leads to existing analyses of the effects of differentiation strategies that cannot be integrated into a unified theoretical framework.To address the above issues, we analyze the limitations of existing studies in terms of the theoretical framework, including the failure to distinguish the impact of different types of differentiations on consumers, the stated preference bias in questionnaire data, and the inapplicability of verification methods. We develop a new theoretical framework and empirical technical route using the theoretical framework of the new empirical industrial organization(NEIO). First, we distinguish between two types of differentiations in the product differentiation strategy, namely, vertical differentiation and horizontal differentiation. Second, we use the NEIO model combining Taobao market sales data of tablet PCs and questionnaire data to calculate consumer demand functions to overcome the stated preference bias. Third, we verify the impact of two different product differentiation strategies on consumer buying behavior using a random-coefficients discrete-choice model, which allows consumers to have systematic taste differences for the same feature and examines the effect of both vertical and horizontal differentiations in an empirical framework.We draw the following conclusions. First, product differentiation strategies based on horizontal differentiation have a significantly positive effect on consumer buying behavior, as increased types of horizontal differentiations can satisfy the specific preferences of consumers and increase the probability of consumer purchase. Second, product differentiation strategies based on vertical differentiation have a negative effect on consumer buying behavior, because vertical differentiation requires consumers to choose between multiple vertical differentiations and overcome the negative feelings about choosing a certain function or feature, thus reducing the probability of consumer choice. The reason for the debate in previous empirical studies on product differentiation is the failure to distinguish between different types of product differentiation. Third, the acquisition of external information can alleviate the negative effect of vertical differentiation on consumer buying behavior.This paper has the following contributions. First, it integrates the NEIO theory into the field of firm competition strategy and marketing research. Second, our results show that the important reasons for the contradictory conclusions of previous empirical studies on the effect of product differentiation, which demonstrates the important theoretical value of this paper. Third, our results provide reference basis for firms to develop effective product competition strategy and differentiated product portfolios.
作者 周末 蒋露薇 臧子悦 张宇杰 Zhou Mo;Jiang Luwei;Zang Ziyue;Zhang Yujie(Business School,University of International Business and Economics;Business School,Imperial College London;School of Data Science,Fudan University;School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University)
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第6期159-170,I0033,I0034,共14页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71572034、71772038) 对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目(CXTD9-03)资助。
关键词 水平差异 垂直差异 信息获取 消费者购买行为 Horizontal Differentiation Vertical Differentiation External Information Acquisition Consumer Buying Behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1桂琦寒,陈敏,陆铭,陈钊.中国国内商品市场趋于分割还是整合:基于相对价格法的分析[J].世界经济,2006,29(2):20-30. 被引量:600
  • 2赵永亮,徐勇.国内贸易与区际边界效应:保护与偏好[J].管理世界,2007,23(9):37-47. 被引量:49
  • 3Anderson J E and Wincoop E V. 2003. Gravity with Cravitas . a Solution to the Border Uzzle [J]. American Economic Review, 20C 1): 170-192.
  • 4Evans C L. 2003. The Economic Significance of National Border Effects [J]. American Economic Review, 93 (4) : 1291 -1312.
  • 5Cheng I H, Wall H. 2005. Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration [J]. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87 (1) : 49-63.
  • 6Head K. and Mayer T. Illusory border effects , distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in Trade [R] . Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales C CEPII) Working Paper. 2002-01.
  • 7Hillberry R, Hummels D L. 2003. Intranational Home Bias: Some Explanations [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (4): 1089-1092.
  • 8Hortacsu A, Jerez AM, Douglas J. 2009. The Geography of Trade in Online Transactions: Evidence from eBay and MercadoLibre [J]. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1 ( 1 ) : 53 -74.
  • 9Lendle A, Marcelo 0, Simon S, 2012. Vezina P. L. There Goes Gravity: How eBay Reduces Trade Costs [R]. CEPR discussion paper, London.
  • 10Martens B, Turlea G. 2012. The Drivers and Impediments for Online Cross- Border Trade in Goods in the EU [R]. Digital Economy Working Paper, I.

共引文献30

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部