期刊文献+

生活希望计划干预对妇科肿瘤患者希望水平、负面情绪及应对方式的影响 被引量:4

Effect of life hope program intervention on hope level,negative emotion and coping style of gynecological tumor patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究生活希望计划干预对妇科肿瘤患者希望水平、负面情绪及应对方式影响。方法:选取2019年1月至2020年1月某院收治的200例妇科肿瘤患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为两组,实验组和对照组各100例,对照组接受常规妇科肿瘤疾病健康教育干预,实验组在对照组基础上接受生活希望计划干预,比较两组患者Health希望量表评分、抑郁自评表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评表(SAS)评分、应对方式问卷(SCSQ)评分以及生活质量评价量表(SF-36)评分。结果:干预1个月后,实验组在Health希望量表的积极态度、积极行为、与他人的亲密关系维度的评分均高于对照组(t=5.320,3.873,3.763;P<0.05);在SDS和SAS的评分均低于对照组(t=2.098,3.296;P<0.05);在SCSQ积极应对维度评分高于对照组(t=17.810,P<0.05),消极应对评分均低于对照组(t=21.223,P<0.05);在SF-36各维度评分均高于对照组(t=4.341,20.031,17.403,5.129,14.760,15.879,15.552,33.933;P<0.05)。结论:生活希望计划干预能提高妇科肿瘤患者希望水平、积极应对方式和生活质量,改善患者的负面情绪和消极应对方式。 Objective:To explore the effect of life hope program intervention on hope level,negative emotion,and coping style of gynecological tumor patients.Methods:A total of 200 cases of gynecological tumor patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as the research object.According to the random number table method,they were divided into two groups,the experimental group,and the control group,100 cases each.The control group received the routine gynecological tumor disease health education intervention,and the experimental group received the living hope plan intervention on the basis of the control group.Health Hope Scale score,self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)score,Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)score,coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ)score and quality of life Assessment Scale(SF-36)score were compared between 2 groups.Results:One month after intervention,the scores of positive attitude,positive behavior and intimate relationship with others in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group(t=5.320,3.873,3.763;P<0.05).The scores in SDS and SAS were lower than those in control group(t=2.098,3.296;P<0.05).Positive coping dimension score in SCSQ was higher than that in control group(t=17.810,P<0.05),and coping score was lower than that in control group(t=21.223,P<0.05).SF-36 scores were higher than those of the control group in all dimensions(t=4.341,20.031,17.403,5.129,14.760,15.879,15.552,33.933;P<0.05).Conclusion:The intervention of life hope plan can improve the level of hope,positive coping style and life quality of gynecological tumor patients,and improve the negative emotion and negative coping style of patients.
作者 王春苗 饶婷 WANG Chunmiao;RAO Ting(Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Nanchang 330006,China;Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 北大核心 2023年第3期342-346,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(编号:20204110)。
关键词 生活希望计划干预 妇科肿瘤 希望水平 负面情绪 应对方式 Life hope plan intervention Gynecological tumor Hope level Negative emotions Coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献213

共引文献4275

同被引文献45

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部