期刊文献+

教育增值评价的内涵解析及应用探讨 被引量:7

Connotation Analysis and Application of Educational Value-added Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 增值评价强调发展、重视起点、关注过程、综合考查学生发展的影响因素,对促进教育变革与发展有一定的现实意义。教育增值评价基于公平性、差异化和素质为先的发展理念,在促进教育均衡化、学校特色化和师生个性化等方面发挥了很大的作用,但增值评价的应用仍存在缺乏统一的标准、评价数据收集难度较大、评价模型多样且复杂、结果应用受限等问题。通过在数据搜集上引入数字技术、承认评价差异性的存在以及对结果报告进行多角度解读等,提出优化措施以提升其应用的可行性。 Value-added evaluation emphasizes development,pays attention to the starting point and process,as well as comprehensively examines the influencing factors of students’development.It has certain practical significance to promote educational change and development.Based on the development concept of fairness,differentiation and quality first,educational value-added evaluation has made great contributions in promoting educational equalization,school specialization and teacher-student individualization.However,there are still some problems in the application of value-added evaluation,such as the lack of uniform standards,the difficulty in collecting evaluation data,the diversity and complexity of evaluation models,and the limited application of results.Therefore,we attempt to improve the feasibility of data collection by introducing digital technology,acknowledging the existence of evaluation differences,and interpreting the results report from multiple perspectives,in order to improve the viability of its application.
作者 蔡旻君 刘芸 CAI Minjun;LIU Yun(College of Educational Technology,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2023年第1期1-7,共7页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 甘肃省教育科学规划“十三五”重点课题“基于县域基础教育质量评估的教师能力素质及关键行为特征研究”(GS[2019]GHBZ129)。
关键词 教育评价 增值评价 评价模型 Educational evaluation Value-added evaluation Evaluation model
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献49

  • 1岳伟,陈俊源,胡祥恩,莫伦.从TVAAS到Individual Growth:美国田纳西州增值性教师评价发展新趋势[J].现代教育管理,2019,0(9):69-77. 被引量:23
  • 2盖笑松,张向葵.多层线性模型在纵向研究中的运用[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):429-431. 被引量:48
  • 3马晓强,彭文蓉,萨丽·托马斯.学校效能的增值评价——对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究[J].教育研究,2006,27(10):77-84. 被引量:102
  • 4Sally Thomas.Value-added measures of school effectiveness in the United Kingdom[J].Prospects.1998(1)
  • 5Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness [M]. Oxford : Pergamon, 1997. 35.
  • 6OECD. Measuring Improvements in Learning Outcomes : Best Practices to Assess the Value-added of Schools [M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.169,1-6.
  • 7Snjd.rs, T., & Bosker, R. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling [M]. London: SAGE, 2012. 48,65.
  • 8Schmidt, W. H., et al. Value-added Research: Right Idea but Wrong Solution? [A]. R. Lissitz. Value-added Models in Education: Theory and Applications [C]. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press, 2005.
  • 9Briggs, D. C., et al. The Sensitivity of Value-added Modeling to the Creation of a Vertical Score Scale [Z]. Paper Presented at the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24, 2008.
  • 10Ballou, D., et al. Controlling for Student Background in Value Added Assessment of Teachers [J]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004, ( 1 ).

共引文献147

同被引文献57

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部