摘要
由于从非历史的人类本质出发,人本主义异化论无法澄清异化的历史根源,而只能将异化归咎为一个纯粹的自我认识问题。以往的观点大多将《1844年经济学哲学手稿》异化劳动批判简单地归入人本主义异化论,而忽略了二者间的内在差别:《1844年经济学哲学手稿》一方面提出了揭示异化历史根源的要求,另一方面明确了由“工业的历史”的辩证运动揭示异化历史根源的基本路径,因而实际上包含了超越人本主义异化论的可能性。《德意志意识形态》通过揭示生产力发展与现存所有制形式的辩证运动,指明异化的历史根源在于分工发展的自发性,从而扬弃了异化劳动批判,并实现了对人本主义异化论的超越。
From the perspective of a historic human essence,humanistic theories of alienation can not clarify the historic origin of alienation,but can only attribute it to a pure problem of self-awareness.Most of the previous views simply take the criticism of alienated labor in Economic&Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 as humanistic theory of alienation,and ignore the internal difference between them:on the one hand,Economic&Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 raises the requirement of revealing the historic origin of alienation;on the other hand,it clarifies the basic path to reveal the historic origin of alienation in the dialectical movement of“industrial history”,which actually contains the possibility of transcending humanistic theories of alienation.By revealing the dialectical movement between the development of productive forces and the existing forms of ownership,The German Ideology points out that the historic origin of alienation lies in the spontaneity of the development of division of labor,thus sublating the criticism of alienated labor and transcending humanistic theories of alienation.
作者
石正瑀
SHI Zheng-yu(International Economics and Trade Innovation and Governance Institute,Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai,201620)
出处
《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第1期41-45,共5页
Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
异化劳动批判
人本主义异化论
异化的历史根源
自发分工
the criticism of alienated labor
humanistic theories of alienation
the historic origin of alienation
spontaneous division of labor