期刊文献+

癌症幸存者久坐行为的研究进展

Advances in Sedentary Behavior among Cancer Survivors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 癌症幸存者预后和生活质量普遍不佳,而久坐行为在癌症幸存者中高发,且与患者多种不良结局密切相关,亟需关注。本研究综述了癌症幸存者久坐行为的相关理论、评估方法、影响因素、与预后的相关性及干预效果,并指出久坐行为已经成为影响癌症幸存者预后的重要危险因素之一;单一的体力活动干预及久坐行为和体力活动的联合干预均可在一定程度上改善癌症幸存者久坐行为;癌症幸存者久坐行为管理是当前亟需解决的重要问题之一,未来应积极开展国内研究,以改善患者预后。 Among cancer survivors who are characterized by poorprognosis and quality of life,there is a high prevalence of sedentary behavior,which is closely associated with adverse outcomes,requiring urgent attention. Based on this,we reviewed the latest advances in sedentary behavior among cancer survivors,including relevant theories,assessment methods,influencing factors,association with prognosis and intervention,and concluded that sedentary behavior that sedentary behavior is a major risk factor for poor prognosis in cancer survivors,and single physical activity intervention or a combined intervention of physical activity and sedentary behavior is effective intervention. Additionally,given the situation where there is an urgent need to manage sedentary behavior in this group,indigenized studies ought to be carried out actively to make some improvements in their prognosis.
作者 陆金玲 许勤 侯慧 胡洁蔓 李维颖 徐欣怡 杨春静 陈丽 LU Jinling;XU Qin;HOU Hui;HU Jieman;LI Weiying;XU Xinyi;YANG Chunjing;CHEN Li(No.1 Gastric Surgery Ward,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China;School of Nursing,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211166,China;No.2 Gastric Surgery Ward,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China;Faculty of Health,Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane 4059,Australia)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第14期1783-1789,共7页 Chinese General Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(82073407)--健康生态学视阈下胃癌幸存者衰弱轨迹探究及干预方案设计。
关键词 癌症幸存者 久坐生活方式 体力活动 预后 互联网干预 综述 Cancer survivors Sedentary behavior Physical exertion Prognosis Internet-based intervention Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1李可基,张宝慧.国际组织和各国政府关于运动促进健康政策及措施的分析与比较[J].体育科学,2003,23(1):91-95. 被引量:37
  • 2Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman AE, et al. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults. Int J Epidemiol,1996,25∶153-159.
  • 3Bassett DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.Res Q Exerc Sport,2000,71(suppl)∶s30-s36.
  • 4Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1993,25∶81-91.
  • 5Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC, Unwin NC, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies in Sub-Saharal Africa.Int J Epidemiol,2001,30∶1361-1368.
  • 6Taylor CB, Coffey T, Berra K, et al. Seven-day activity and self-report compared to direct measure of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol,1984,120∶818-824.
  • 7Dishman RK, Steinhardt M. Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d recall of physical activity in college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1988,20∶14-25.
  • 8US Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity & Health,1996.
  • 9Laporte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Rep,1985,100∶131-146.
  • 10Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ. Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1997,29∶s5-s9.

共引文献390

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部