期刊文献+

基于德尔菲法的《排卵障碍性不孕症中西医结合诊疗指南》第一轮问卷调查分析

Analysis on the First Round of Questionnaires in Guidelines for Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovulatory Disorder Infertility Based on Delphi Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建《排卵障碍性不孕症中西医结合诊疗指南》(以下简称《指南》)的专家调研问卷,以便最终建立《指南》。方法采用德尔菲法,在文献调研的基础上编制《指南》第一轮专家问卷,向全国58位专家发送调查问卷,从临床问题、辨证分型、结局指标等方面进行评分,对问卷的专家意见集中程度、协调程度及问卷信度进行评价。结果回收有效问卷58份,专家积极系数为100%,临床问题问卷Cronbach’s α系数为0.944,辨证分型问卷Cronbach’s α系数为0.930,结局指标问卷Cronbach’s α系数为0.934,初步筛选《指南》的临床问题、辨证分型与结局指标。结论专家对排卵障碍性不孕症临床问题、辨证分型与结局指标的集中程度和协调程度不一,尚需进一步进行专家问卷调查,使专家意见逐步达成共识,以建立临床实用且科学的《指南》。 Objective To formulate expert survey questionnaire in Guidelines for the integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine diagnosis and treatment of ovulatory disorder infertility(hereinafter referred to as“the Guidelines”);To finally establish the Guidelines.Methods Delphi method was used to compile the first round of expert questionnaire of the Guideline on the basis of literature research.The questionnaire was sent to 58 experts nationwide.The clinical problems,syndrome differentiation and outcome indicators were scored,and the concentration,coordination and reliability of the expert opinions of the questionnaire were evaluated.Results Totally 58 valid questionnaires were collected.The positive coefficient of experts was 100%;the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the clinical problems questionnaire was 0.944;the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the syndrome differentiation questionnaire was 0.930;the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the outcome indicators questionnaire was 0.934.The clinical problems,syndrome differentiation and outcome indicators of the Guidelines were under preliminary screening.Conclusion Experts have different degrees of concentration and coordination of clinical problems,syndrome differentiation and outcome indicators of ovulatory disorder infertility.Further expert questionnaire survey is needed to gradually reach a consensus on the opinions of experts,so as to establish a clinical practical and scientific guideline.
作者 马堃 王洁楠 刘昱 靳英辉 邱瑞瑾 杨硕 李敏 MA Kun;WANG jienan;LIU Yu;JIN Yinghui;QIU Ruijin;YANG Shuo;LI Min(Xiyuan Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100091,China;China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430062,China;Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing,Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China;Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China)
出处 《中国中医药信息杂志》 CAS CSCD 2023年第3期137-141,共5页 Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 中华中医药学会标准化项目(20211221-BZ-CACM) 北京市科学技术委员会项目(Z17110000107104) 中国民族医药学会科研项目(2021Z2072-340503)。
关键词 排卵障碍性不孕症 诊疗指南 德尔菲法 ovulatory disorder infertility guidelines for diagnosis and treatment Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献90

  • 1代顺华,吴必展.温通针法治疗原发性痛经寒凝血瘀证的临床研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,0(76):5-6. 被引量:6
  • 2Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory [M], 3nd Edition. New York: Mc- Graw-Hill, 1994.
  • 3James RM. The relationship between number of response categories and reliability oflikert-type questionnaires [J]. J Edu Meas, 1974, 11: 49- 53.
  • 4EU P. COX IIl. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review[J]. J Mark Res, 1980, 17: 407-422.
  • 5Duane F, Alwin. Information transmission in the survey interview: number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement[J]. Soeio Meth, 1992, 22:83-118.
  • 6Debroah LB,Craig KE. The effects of nonnormality and number of response categories on reliability[J]. Appl Meas Educ, 1996, 9: 151-160.
  • 7Carolyn CP, Andrew MC. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent Preferences[J]. Acta Psychol, 2000, 104: 1-15.
  • 8Li-Jen Weng. Impact of the number of response categories and anchorlabels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability [J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2004, 64: 956-972.
  • 9Luis ML, Eduardo Garcta-Cueto. Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales [J].Methodology, 2008, 4: 73-79.
  • 10Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, Uwe K, Donna C. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects[ J ]. Behav Res Meth, 2009, 41: 295-308.

共引文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部