摘要
隐私作为当今社会的核心概念,极具历史生成性和文化差异性,其研究遍及多个学科,纠缠于彼此竞争和矛盾之维,充满各种截然不同的含义。隐私认知的概念困境,源于隐私现象自身的复杂性及概念化方案的分歧。隐私概念化的两大基本方案,本质主义和实用主义,前者致力于本质寻求,遭遇“共同性”困难,随之转向后者,致力于行之有效,却陷入“普遍性”困境。可见,能否提供合理化的方案成为隐私认知的关键。由此,展开方案批判,实现对本质主义和实用主义的超越,形成隐私概念化的互补方案,以之为隐私认知奠定方法论基础。
As the core concept of today’s society,privacy is a concept with historical generation and cultural differences.The study of privacy spans many disciplines,is entangled in competing and contradictory dimensions,and is full of very different meanings.The conceptual dilemma of privacy cognition stems from the complexity of the privacy phenomenon itself,and rises to the disagreement of conceptual scheme.There are two basic schemes for defining privacy:essentialism,which strives for essence and suffers from the difficulty of“commonality”,and pragmatism,which strives for effectiveness but falls into the difficulty of“universality”.Therefore,whether a reasonable plan can be provided becomes the key to privacy cognition.Therefore,the critique of the scheme is carried out to achieve the transcendence of essentialism and pragmatism and form a complementary approach to conceptualizing privacy,which lays a methodological foundation for privacy cognition.
作者
王金柱
张旭
WANG Jin-zhu;ZHANG Xu(School of Philosophy,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China;School of Humanities,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处
《系统科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第1期34-37,共4页
Chinese Journal of Systems Science
关键词
隐私
概念化
本质主义
实用主义
互补方法
privacy
conceptualization
essentialism
pragmatism
complementary method