期刊文献+

PPP项目物有所值评价法的优化建议——基于广东省102个重大项目的典型研究 被引量:1

Suggestions on Improving Value-for-Money Evaluation in the Public-Private Partnership-Based on the Typical Study of 102 Major Projects in Guangdong Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着政府与社会资本合作(PPP)项目的提速扩容,其项目的绩效管理就显得尤为重要。广东省作为经济大省,其PPP项目的发展存在跨地域广、各地方财政收支落差巨大、粤东西北发展和珠三角明显不均衡等问题。本文以此为背景筛选出广东省102个投资金额10亿元以上的PPP项目作为样本进行定性和定量分析,主要是基于分析计算出项目的PSC和VfM值,并通过相似度检验和灰色关联分析方法发掘出各PPP项目中物有所值评价之间关系的区别。研究发现,现存物有所值体系需确立统一评估口径,完善评价指标体系;健全事前评估体系,协调制衡地区发展;优化完善评价政策,强化准确详尽适地;加强对物有所值评价流程监管,构建风险化解预警机制。 With the speedy expansion of PPP projects,the performance management of the projects is particularly important.As an economically important province,Guangdong has a wide range of PPP projects,a huge difference between local financial revenues and expenditures,and an obvious imbalance between the development of the East,West,North and the Pearl River Delta Region of Guangdong.In this paper,102 PPP projects with more than 1 billion CHY investment in Guangdong Province are selected as samples for descriptive statistics and related qualitative and quantitative analyses,mainly based on the analysis to calculate the PSC and VfM values of the projects,and to discover the differences between the value-for-money evaluations of PPP projects through similarity tests and gray correlation analysis.It is found that the existing value-for-money system needs to establish a unified evaluation approach and improve the evaluation index system,improve the pre-evaluation system and coordinate the balance of regional development,optimize and improve the evaluation policies and make the policies more intensified,accurate and appropriate,strengthen process evaluation,and establish early warning mechanism of risks.
作者 朱健齐 黄熳婕 黄再添 Zhu Jianqi;Huang Manjie;Huang Zaitian(College of Economics and Management,Foshan University,Foshan 528000,China)
出处 《金融理论探索》 2023年第1期61-72,共12页 Exploration of Financial Theory
基金 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“一带一路倡议下粤港澳大湾区与东南亚协同发展模式研究”(GD20SQ25) 广东省财政厅财政科研课题资助 第十七届学术挑战杯比赛作品阶段成果。
关键词 政府和社会资本合作 绩效管理 物有所值评价法 基准评价法 Public-Private Partnership management of performance Value-for-Money Evaluation Benchmarking Methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献149

共引文献252

同被引文献24

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部