期刊文献+

戏剧艺术中的书写--浅析德里达对语音逻各斯的解构

Writing in Dramatic Art--On Derrida’s Deconstruction of Phono Centralism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为解构主义的代表,德里达一直致力于解构形而上学的二元对立,尤其是语音与文字的对立,即语音逻各斯。而这一二元对立的形成又可以追溯到柏拉图的摹仿论。德里达则试图借助戏剧中书写的展现来对其进行解构,戏剧作为文学的艺术作品,同样被柏拉图认为是充斥着摹仿性的、再现的美学,在对文学文本进行分析时,德里达适时地引入了马拉美《摹仿》一文中提到的哑剧,以及阿尔托的残酷戏剧来作为“帮手”去解构语音逻各斯,戏剧于德里达的解构来说占据着特殊的位置。 As a representative of deconstruction,Derrida has been committed to deconstructing the binary opposition of metaphysics, especially the opposition between speech and writing, that is, phono centralism. The formation of this binary opposition can be traced back to Plato’s mimesis. Derrida tries to deconstruct with the help of the presentation of writing in the drama. As a literary work of art, drama is also regarded by Plato as full of imitative and reproducing aesthetics. When analyzing the literary text, Derrida timely introduces the pantomime mentioned in Mallarme’s text, And Artaud’s cruel drama as a "helper" to deconstruct phono centralism. Drama occupies a special position in Derrida’s deconstruction theory.
作者 王晶石 庞晓曼 Wang Jingshi;Pang Xiaoman
出处 《外语教育研究》 2022年第4期60-66,共7页 Foreign Language Education & Research
基金 国家社科基金“德里达‘药’的文学哲学研究”(20CWW001)阶段性成果。
关键词 语音 文字/书写 戏剧 摹仿 解构 speech writing drama mimesis deconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献80

  • 1柏拉图.《国家篇》,载《柏拉图全集》第2卷,王晓朝译,北京:人民出版社,2003年,第613页.
  • 2Antonin Artaud, The Theater and Its Double, trans. Mary Caroline Richards, New York: Grove Press, 1958, p. 115, p. 84, p. 13, p. 41, p. 42, p. 92, p.8, pp. 31-32, p. 86, p. 102, pp. 96-97, p. 125, p. 117, p. 61, p. 89, p.42, p. 43, p. 109, p. 89, p. 40, p. 86, p. 39, p. 48, p. 51, p. 140, p. 80, pp. 30-52, p. 77, p. 85, p. 13, p. 12.
  • 3Patrice Pavis, Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts, and Analysis, tram. Christine Shantz, Toronto and Buffalo, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998, p. 403.
  • 4Matei Calinescu, Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism, Durham: Duke University Press, 1987, p. 10.
  • 5David Graver, "Antonin Artaud and the Authority of Text, Spectacle, and Performance", in James Martin Harding (ed.), Contours of the Theatrical Avant-Garde: Performance and Textuality, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2000, p. 55.
  • 6Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation and Other Essays, New York: Farrar Straus, 1966, p. 116.
  • 7Susan Sontag, Under the Sign of Saturn, New York: Picador, 2002, p. 142.
  • 8Jacques Derrida, "La Parole soufflee", in Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978, p. 175, pp. 175-176, p. 176/192, pp. 174-175, p. 180, p. 193.
  • 9Jacques Demda, "The Theater of Cruelty and the Closure of Representation", in Writing and Difference,p. 238, pp. 238-248, p. 243, p. 250, p. 250, p. 309.
  • 10Jacques Derrida, "Differance", in Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 11-12.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部