《信托法》第10条解释论

Interpretation of Article 10 of the Trust Law

由于信托起源于英美法系,对于这种舶来品,大陆法系国家在建立制度时需考虑法域习惯等诸多因素,因此制定信托法规时出现大量留白。以我国《信托法》第10条所规定的信托登记制度为例,这一制度造成人们在信托登记操作时有法可依却无法操作,如由谁申请登记、向何机关申请、登记范围为何以及登记程序如何等问题均无完善规定。无疑,这为信托内部权利保障以及信托外部交易安全都增加了巨大风险。因此,利用法学方法论对我国《信托法》第10条进行解释,基于信托财产独立性之特征,结合信托登记域外经验,阐述我国现行信托登记制度现状,找出一种既符合《信托法》立法要求又符合实务要求的信托登记方式,是具有理论与实践意义的。

Because trust originated from Common Law system, civil law countries need to consider many factors such as jurisdictional habits when establishing the system, so there are a lot of gaps in the formulation of trust laws and regulations. Taking the trust registration system stipulated in Article 10 of China’s Trust Law as an example, there is a law to follow but unable to operate in the practice of trust registration in our country. For example, there are not perfect provisions on who applies for registration, where to apply for registration,what the scope of registration is and how the registration procedure is. There is no doubt that this increases great risks for the protection of internal rights of the trust and the security of external transactions of the trust. Therefore, it is of theoretical and practical significance to use legal methodology to explain Article 10 of China’s Trust Law, based on trust registration and the characteristics of trust property,under the current legal framework, combined with China’s current registration system and the relevant extraterritorial experience of trust registration. it is meaningful to find a way of trust registration that not only meets the legislative purpose of the Trust Law, but also meets the requirements of practice.