期刊文献+

学业手册:法国义务教育阶段学业评价的重要工具

The Academic Evaluation Handbook:an Important Tool for the Academic Evaluation of French Compulsory Education Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “学业手册”是法国教育部为了加强义务教育质量监测,长期追踪和记录学生的学业表现,以《个人能力手册》为蓝本设计制作的学生学业评价操作指南,由定期报告、阶段末报告和必修证书三部分组成。“学业手册”以激励学生进步为目的,是教育部门依托国家统一的数字平台,与学校、家庭共享学生发展信息,对义务教育阶段学生学业进行全方位、全过程评价。我国学生学业评价应致力于设计制作教学评一体化的学生学业评价工具;建立统一、连续、全程化的学业评价体系,完善学业述评制度,突出评价的真实性;运用数字化等信息化资源,提高评价的便捷性、操作性。 The“Academic Evaluation Handbook”is an operational guide for students’academic evaluation designed by the French Ministry of Education,based on the“Handbook of Individual Competencies”,in order to strengthen the monitoring of the quality of compulsory education and to track and record students’academic performance over time.It consists of three parts:periodic reports,endof-cycle reports and compulsory certificates.The“Academic Evaluation Handbook”is designed to motivate students’progress,and is a tool for the education department to share information on students’development with schools and families through a unified national digital platform,and to evaluate students”academic performance at the compulsory education level in a comprehensive and holistic manner.Chinese students’academic evaluation should be committed to development,and it is necessary to design and produce an integrated tool for student academic evaluation;establishing a unified,continuous,and whole process academic evaluation system and improving the academic review system will help highlight the authenticity of the evaluation;the use of digital and other information resources helps to improve the convenience and operability of the academic evaluation.
作者 段陈影 段兆兵 DUAN Chenying;DUAN Zhaobing(School of Education Science,Anhui Normal University,Anhui Wuhu 241000,China)
出处 《教育参考》 2023年第1期47-54,共8页 Education Approach
关键词 学业评价 法国 评价工具 Academic Evaluation Handbook French Academic Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1高如峰.90年代法国教育改革研究[J].外国教育研究,1997(5):13-19. 被引量:13
  • 2喻文德.论社会主义核心价值观对实现中国梦的伦理支撑[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2014,20(6):40-44. 被引量:6
  • 3Cour des comptes. La gestion du systeme educatif,Rapport au president de la republique suivi des reponses des administrations interessees [ R ]. Paris, 2003.
  • 4Comite National d'Evaluation. De Berlin aBergen: nouveaux enjeux de l'evaluation [ R ]. Dijon, 2004.
  • 5ComiteNational d'Evaluation. Indicateurs pourlevaluation[J]. Bulletin,1995,(19):1.
  • 6Christine Musselin. La longue marche des universites francaises[ M ]. Paris :PUF.,2001. 107.
  • 7Alejandro Tiana-Ferrer. Pilotage par les resultats etamelioration de l'edueation: deux realites indissoeiables? [J]. Administration et education, 2003, (98) : 27.
  • 8Claude Thelot. Pourquoi faut-il evaluer l'ecole?[J]. Administration et edueation,2003, (98) :9-12.
  • 9Philippe Joutard et Claude Thelot. Reussir l'ecole[M]. Paris: Le Seuil, 1999.
  • 10Claude Thelot. La prineipale faiblesse de l'evaluation et du controle de l'ecole en France [J]. Revue intemationale d'education de Sevres,2008, (48):97-108.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部