被害人危险接受场合下自我答责规则的适用

Application of Self-responsibility Rules in the Situation of Victim’s Dangerous Acceptance

被害人危险接受的场合下,若行为人没有明显违反注意义务,且被害人对自己的行为可能造成的危险有或应有充分认识并义无反顾继续该行为的情况,应当视为被害人对于该危险表示接受,即使造成了严重后果,也应当为行为人构建可能的出罪路径,不能一味追究刑事责任。在司法实务的大量案件中,常会出现被害人危险接受的情况类似但是对于行为人的判决结果不同的情况,导致司法公信力被质疑。文章就被害人危险接受场合下自我答责及其他相关规则的选择与适用进行分析,并提出自我答责理论的完善建议。

In the case of dangerous acceptance by the victim,if the perpetrator has not obviously violated the duty of care,and the victim has or should have full knowledge of the possible danger caused by his own behavior and has no hesitation to continue the behavior,it should be regarded as the victim’s acceptance of the danger.Even if serious consequences have been caused,it should also build a possible path for the perpetrator to commit the crime,and should not be blindly investigated for criminal responsibility.In a large number of cases in judicial practice,there are often similar situations in which the victim’s dangerous acceptance is similar,but the judgment results for the actor are different,leading to the judicial credibility being questioned.The article analyzes the selection and application of self-responsibility and other relevant rules in the situation of victim’s dangerous acceptance,and puts forward suggestions for the improvement.