摘要
论元结构的分析是谓词逻辑和认知语法研究的核心问题之一,但一个动词包含几个论元还有很大的分歧,由此造成句法理论的很多矛盾。本文认为论元应该是与动词直接关联的对象,而论元研究中最重要的是区分固有论元与非固有论元。其中固有论元指动词内在的、不可预测的、需要记忆的论元,判定固有论元应该满足平行周遍原则。
The analysis of argument structure is one of the major topics in studies of predicate logic and cognitive linguistics.However,there is wide disagreement in determining the number of arguments.This paper argues that an argument is a noun phrase which can connect the verb directly.It is most important to distinguish intrinsic arguments from extrinsic arguments.The former here denotes an argument which belongs to a verb naturally and thus cannot be deduced,while the latter can be generated by linguistic rules.The two types of arguments can be identified via the parallel-general principle.
作者
陈保亚
鲁方昕
CHEN Baoya;LU Fangxin
出处
《语言学论丛》
2022年第2期17-30,共14页
Essays on Linguistics
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“语言变异和接触机制研究”(项目编号:19JJD740001)
北京市社会科学基金重大项目“多语接触与中介语演化机制”(项目编号:20ZDA20)的支持。
关键词
论元
语义角色
固有论元
平行周遍
argument
semantic role
intrinsic argument
parallel-general principle