期刊文献+

游戏化发放方式对优惠券使用意愿及行为的影响

The Impact of Gamified Distribution on Coupon Redemption Intentions and Behaviors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了优惠券的两种游戏化发放方式(机会型游戏和技能型游戏)对消费者使用优惠券的意愿及行为的影响。我们提出了一个认知-情感双路径理论模型来解释该影响的作用机制。通过两个实地实验和一个在线实验,我们发现与直接赠送相比,采用机会型游戏和技能型游戏发放优惠券可以通过提升感知稀缺性和感知趣味性提高和增加优惠券使用意愿及行为,但这两种游戏化发放方式在影响感知趣味性的机制上存在显著差异。本研究对优惠券促销和游戏化设计的相关文献做出了理论贡献,并有助于零售商改进其优惠券促销设计。 This paper analyzed the impact of two gamified distribution methods of coupons(namely games of chance and games of skill)on consumers’ intentions and behaviors of coupon redemption. A cognitive-emotional dual-path theoretical model is proposed to account for the underlying mechanisms. Across two field experiments and one online experiment, we found that compared with directly-delivered coupons, coupons delivered through chance-based or skill-based games are more likely to be redeemed. These effects are mediated by perceived scarcity of the coupon and perceived enjoyment of the coupon delivery process. In addition, the impact of chance-based games on perceived enjoyment is mediated by perceived luck, whereas that of skill-based games is mediated by perceived effort. Our research contributes to the literature on coupon promotion and gamification design, and provides important guidances for the design of coupon promotions.
作者 庞隽 李梦琳 邱凌云 陈欢 Pang Jun;Li Menglin;Qiu Lingyun;Chen Huan(School of Business,Renmin University of China;Guanghua School of Management,Peking University;CNPC Managers Training Institute)
出处 《营销科学学报》 2022年第3期80-98,共19页 Journal of Marketing Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072179)的资助。
关键词 优惠券促销 游戏化 机会型游戏 技能型游戏 优惠券使用 coupon promotion gamification games of chance games of skill coupon redemption
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1Yeshin,Tony.Sales Promotion[M].London: Thomson Learning,2006.
  • 2Mela,Carl F,Kamel Jedidi and Douglas Bowman.The Long Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1998,35(2):250-262.
  • 3Ailawadi,Kusum L, Scott A Neslin and Karen Gedenk.Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands versus National Brand Promotions[J]. Journal of Marketing,2001,65(1):71-89.
  • 4Kahneman,Daniel,and Amos Tversky.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica,1979,47:263-290.
  • 5Shi,Yi-Zheng, Ka-Man Cheung, and Gerard Prendergast. Behavioural Response to Sales Promotion Tools: A Hong Kong Study[J]. International Journal of Advertising,2005,24(4):467-486.
  • 6Chandon,Pierre,Brian Wansink,and Gilles Laurent.A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Marketing,2000,64(4):65-81.
  • 7Huff, Lenard C,and Dana L Alden. An investigation of consumer response to sales promotions in developing markets: A three-country analysis[J]. Journal of Advertising Researeh,1998,38(3):47-56.
  • 8Kuhberger, Anton.The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,75(1):23-55.
  • 9Gonzalez,Richard,and George Wu.On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function[J]. Cognitive Psychology,1999,38:129-166.
  • 10Tversky,Amos,Shmuel Sattath,and Paul Slovic. Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice[J]. Psychological Review,1988,95(3): 371-384.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部