召集瑕疵语境下公司决议效力的类型化区分--兼评“刘某与江某、佛山某商贸有限公司决议纠纷案”

Typological Discrimination of the Effectiveness of Corporate Resolutions in the Context of Convening Defects:Liu v. Jiang & Foshan Trading Co., Ltd.

“刘某与江某、佛山某商贸有限公司决议纠纷案”揭示出股东(大)会召集瑕疵语境下不同决议效力类型之间边界模糊,难以界分之困境。召集瑕疵对公司决议效力影响主要有“不成立”“可撤销”“有效”三种类型。会议召集制度蕴含了正义、自治、效率、规范等基本价值,在召集瑕疵语境下这些价值可能会发生冲突,此时不同的价值选择应是动态性的、适应性的。运用利益衡量方法可知,不同召集瑕疵样态下的利益配置亦应有所不同。通过“三层次判断法”的引入与适用,能够更好地纾解实践中的界分困境,调和正义、自治、效率、规范等价值之间的内在冲突,实现股东、董事会、公司等主体之间的利益平衡,并实现公司治理的规范化。

The case of Liu v. Jiang & Foshan Trading Co., Ltd. reveals the dilemma that the boundary between different types of resolutions is blurred and difficult to distinguish in the context of the defective convening of the shareholders’ meeting. There are three types of influence on the effectiveness of the company’s resolution caused by the defect of convening, including“nonestablishment”,“ being revocable”and“being effective”.The conference convening system contains the basic values of justice, autonomy, efficiency and norms. In the context of convening flaws, these values may conflict, and different value choices should be dynamic and adaptive. Using the interest measurement method, we can see that the interest allocation under different convening defects should be different. Through the introduction and application of the“Three-level Judgment Method”, we can better ease the dilemma of division in practice, and reconcile the internal conflicts between the values of justice autonomy efficiency and norms, and achieve the balance of interests among shareholders,the board of directors, the company and other subjects, and realize the standardization of corporate governance.