周予同经学研究的逻辑

Zhou Yutong’s Study Logic of Confucian Classics

以理性精神始,遵循“教”“学”分离、学中探术、以学言变的路径展开,以科学的史学形态终,是周予同经学研究的基本逻辑。把经学与儒教区分开来,以理性精神批判儒家的宗教性,确立经学的学术性质,是周予同经学研究逻辑的第一环。学术性质的经学与政治统治术略之间存在着互动关系,通过研究经学的产生与更替、经典名目的变化等学术问题探索政治统治术略的变化,是其经学研究逻辑的第二环。在把经学视为反映政治术略变化的基础上,对经学展开“超经学的研究”,用历史学的方法发掘经典材料,总结经学演变规律,是其经学研究逻辑的第三环。周予同的经学研究逻辑,蕴含赋予经学史学形态从而延续经学文脉的价值指向,对当下的经学研究依然具有借鉴意义。

The basic logic of Zhou Yutong’s study of Confucian classics is to start with the rational spirit,follow the path of separating teaching and learning, exploring skills in learning and changing with skills, and end with a scientific historical form. The first link of Zhou Yutong’s study logic is to distinguish Confucian classics from Confucianism, criticize the religious nature of Confucianism with rational spirit, and establish the academic nature of Confucian classics. There is an interactive relationship between the academic Confucian classics and the political ruling strategy. To explore the changes of the political ruling strategy through the study of the generation and replacement of the Confucian classics and the changes of the classical titles is the second link of his Confucian study logic. On the basis of taking the Confucian classics as a reflection of the changes in political science, it is the third link of his research logic to carry out “super classics research” on the Confucian classics, explore the classic materials and summarize the evolution laws of the Confucian classics with the method of history. Zhou Yutong’s research logic of Confucian classics contains the value orientation of giving Confucian classics a historical form, thus continuing the context of Confucian classics. It still has the reference significance for the current study of Confucian classics.