摘要
知识产权诉讼中“有专门知识的人”在法律法规的沿革中不断完善。虽有制度基础,但在司法实践中,仍易将其与“专家证人”“专家辅助人”等概念混淆,导致证据定性不清晰,同时未有明确适用规定造成运行机制不完善。据此,对中国裁判文书网知识产权纠纷案件中“有专门知识的人”适用现状进行实证分析,就健全知识产权案件中“有专门知识的人”的工作机制提出相应建议,以充分发挥“有专门知识的人”对维护知识产权案件审判公正性的积极作用。
The“person with expertise”in intellectual property litigation has been constantly improved in the evolution of laws and regulations.Although there is a system basis,in judicial practice,it is still easy to confuse it with the concepts of“expert witness”and“expert assistant”,which leads to the unclear nature of the evidence,and the lack of clear applicable provisions leads to the imperfect operation mechanism.Based on this,this paper makes an empirical analysis of the current situation of the application of“people with expertise”in intellectual property dispute cases of the China judicial document network,and puts forward corresponding suggestions on improving the working mechanism of“people with expertise”in intellectual property cases,so as to give full play to the positive role of“people with expertise”in safeguarding the fairness of the trial of intellectual property cases.
出处
《黄冈职业技术学院学报》
2023年第1期82-86,共5页
Journal of Huanggang Polytechnic
关键词
知识产权诉讼
有专门知识的人
实证研究
Intellectual property litigation
People with expertise
Empirical research