期刊文献+

河道水面线推求方法比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Methods for Calculating River Water-Surface Profile
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水面线的推求是山洪灾害评价的关键工作,因此有必要探讨水面线推求方法。水面线推求方法主要采用水力学方法以及曼宁公式,对比两种方法的精度。选取有实测水位资料的孔家坡河道,该河段无区间汇水,应用两种方法分别推求河道水位,与实测水位资料进行对比,两种方法计算精度相接近。沿河村落分布广而多、河道比降较小的条件下,采用曼宁公式与水力学方法推求水面线精度相接近,可以采用曼宁公式简化计算方法。河道比降较大的情况下,曼宁公式计算精度较差,应采用水面线方法进行推求。 The calculation of water surface profile is the key work of the mountain flood disaster evaluation.Therefore,it is necessary to discuss the calculation method of water surface profile. The hydraulic method and Manning formula were mainly used to calculate the water surface profile,and the accuracy of the two methods was compared. The Kongjiapo river channel with measured water level data was selected. There was no interval water in the section. The two methods were used to calculate the water level of the river channel,and the calculation accuracy of the two methods was close to that of the measured water level data. Under the condition that there are many villages along the river and the river gradient is small,Manning formula could be used to simplify the calculation method because the accuracy of water surface profile is close to that of hydraulic method. In case of large river gradient,Manning’s formula has poor calculation accuracy,so the water surface profile method should be used for calculation.
作者 王文浩 WANG Wen-hao
出处 《山西水利科技》 2022年第4期40-43,69,共5页 Shanxi Hydrotechnics
关键词 曼宁公式 水力学方法 水面线 Manning formula hydraulic method water surface profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1王志力,耿艳芬,金生.带源项浅水方程的通量平衡离散[J].水科学进展,2005,16(3):373-379. 被引量:10
  • 2耿艳芬,王志力,金生.一维浅水方程的高精度GODUNOV格式[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑),2005,20(4):507-512. 被引量:14
  • 3Jin M, Fread D L. Dynamic flood routine with explicit and implicit numerical solution schemes[ J]. J. Hydraul. Engrg, 1997, 123(3): 166-173.
  • 4Zhou J G, Causon D M, Mingham C G, et al. The surface gradient method for the treatment of source terms in the shallow water equations[J].J. Comput. Phys, 2001, 168:1 -25.
  • 5Nujic M. Efficient implementation of non- oscillatory schemes for the computation of free -surface flows[ J]. J. Hydraul. Res, 1995, 33(1): 100-111.
  • 6Ying X Y, Wang S S Y. Improved implementation of the HLL approximate Riemann solver for one - dimensional open channel flows[ J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2008, 46( 1 ) : 21 - 34.
  • 7Brun G, Herard J M, Jeandel D, Uhlmann M. An approximate riemann solver for second moment closures[ J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 151 (2) : 990 - 996.
  • 8Toro F E. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics[ M]. Berlin:Springer- Verlag, 1999.
  • 9Bermudez A, Vazquez M E. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms[ J]. Comput. Fluid, 1994,23(8): 1049-107.
  • 10Xu K. A well-balanced gas-kinetic scheme for the shallow water equations with source terms [ J ]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 178 : 533 - 562.

共引文献70

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部