加拿大情报证据披露制度研究--以《加拿大证据法》第38条为中心的展开

Disclosure System of Canadian Intelligence to Evidence:Research Based on Article 38 of the Canada Evidence Act

[研究目的]随着情报证据在诉讼程序中的广泛应用,诉讼程序的公开性与情报证据的秘密性之间的冲突不断加剧。合理调整情报证据披露制度,进而平衡“权力--权利”的关系,对于缓解情报证据披露与保密的紧张关系具有重要意义。[研究方法]通过文献分析、判例分析等方法,并以《加拿大证据法》第38条为中心,对加拿大情报证据披露制度的发展变迁、改革实践进行深入研究。[研究结论]经过不断发展和革新,加拿大建立起了以分庭审查模式为主要特征的情报证据披露制度。尽管加拿大情报证据披露制度在学理和实践层面仍然存在部分论争,但其平衡“权力--权利”关系的制度设计值得深入研究。

[Research purpose]With the wide application of intelligence evidence in litigation proceedings,the conflict between the openness of litigation proceedings and the confidentiality of intelligence evidence is growing.Reasonably adjusting the intelligence to evidence disclosure system and balancing the relationship between“power and right”is of great significance to ease the tension between intelligence to evidence disclosure and confidentiality.[Research method]Through literature analysis,case analysis and other methods,and centering on Article 38 of the Canada Evidence Act,this article conducts an in-depth study on the development,changes and reform practice of the Canadian intelligence to evidence disclosure system.[Research conclusion]Through continuous development and innovation,Canada has established an intelligence to evidence disclosure system characterized by the review mode of chambers.Although there are still some controversies in the academic and practical aspects of the system,its design of balancing the“power and right”relationship is worthy of in-depth study.