中国一线与新一线城市创新效率及影响因素研究

Research on Innovation Efficiency and Influencing Factors of First Tier and New First Tier Cities in China

文章比较了一线和新一线城市间创新效率,得出主要结论:在综合创新上,深沪京构成领先型、穗杭苏宁甬等构成率先型、汉莞沙蓉构成提优型,渝镐津郑青沈昆等组成追赶型;在知识型创新上,京宁武等组成第一梯队,深津郑等组成第二梯队;在技术型创新上,京深沪等长三角、珠三角、京津冀9城市组成率先引领型,汉蓉镐等10城市组成紧追争先型;知识型与技术型创新的有效融合是提升城市综合创新的关键,京深综合创新差距提供了极好的例证。

This paper compares the eficiency of innovation between the first and the new tier cities.The main conclusions are as follows:in terms of comprehensive innovation,Shenzhen,Shanghai and Beijing constitute the leading type,Guangzhou,Hangzhou,Suzhou,Nanjing and Ningbo constitute the forefront type,Wuhan,Dongguan,Changsha and Chengdu as the superior type,Chongqing,Xi'an,Tianjin,Zhengzhou,Qingdao,Shenyang and Kunming as the pursuing type;the knowledge innovation investment cities are divided into three categories,which are represented by Beijing,Nanjing and Wuhan,which are the first tier,and the second tier is composed of Shenzhen,Tianjin and Zhengzhou with characteristic development;technological innovation investment cities are divided into two categories:9 first-line and new first-line cities in Yangtze River Delta,Pearl RiverDelta and Beijing Tianjin Hebei Urban Agglomeration,such as Beijing,Shenzhen and Shanghai,and 10 new first-line cities in Wuhan,Chengdu and Xi'an;the effective integration of knowledge-based and technological innovation is thekey to promote urban comprehensive innovation,and the gap between Beijing and Shenzhen provides an excellent example.