期刊文献+

低磁化率锆合金的研究进展 被引量:1

Research progress on zirconium alloys with low magnetic susceptibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金属植入物在磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)诊断中常产生较大的伪影,严重降低MRI图像的质量,进而影响病理诊断分析。降低金属植入物的磁化率是降低MRI伪影的有效途径。医用锆合金以其优良的生物相容性,优越的综合力学性能和较低的磁化率成为近年来的研究热点。回顾了锆合金的发展历史,分析了相组成和合金元素对锆合金磁化率的影响,详细介绍了Zr-Nb合金、Zr-Mo合金、Zr-Ru合金等低磁化率锆合金的研究现状,展望了锆合金作为医疗器械候选材料的发展前景。 Metal implants often produce large artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)diagnosis,which seriously reduce the quality of MRI images,and then affect the pathological diagnosis and analysis.Reducing the magnetic susceptibility of metal implants is an effective way to reduce MRI artifacts.Medical Zr alloys have become a research hotspot in recent years due to their excellent biocompatibility,superior comprehensive mechanical properties and low magnetic susceptibility.The development history of Zr alloys was reviewed,the effects of phase composition and alloying elements on the magnetic susceptibility of Zr alloys were analyzed,the research status of Zr alloys with low magnetic susceptibility such as Zr-Nb-based alloys,Zr-Mo-based alloys and Zr-Ru alloys were introduced in detail,and the development prospect of Zr alloys as candidate materials for medical devices was prospected.
作者 李飞 李强 LI Fei;LI Qiang(School of Mechanical Engineering,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China;Shanghai Engineering Research Center of High-Performance Medical Device Materials,Shanghai 200093,China)
出处 《有色金属材料与工程》 2023年第1期40-47,共8页 Nonferrous Metal Materials and Engineering
基金 上海市自然科学基金资助项目(15ZR1428400) 上海高性能医疗器械材料工程技术研究中心资助项目(20DZ2255500)。
关键词 磁共振成像 伪影 磁化率 锆合金 magnetic resonance imaging artifact magnetic susceptibility Zr alloy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1马远征,关长勇,陈兴,白一冰,孙继桐,薛海滨.自体椎体骨钛网支架融合器在颈椎病治疗中的应用[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(12):793-795. 被引量:4
  • 2严晓东,高勃,王忠义,陈静.MTT法评价牙科激光立体成形钛锆合金的细胞毒性[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(5):261-263. 被引量:10
  • 3张桦.大剂量地塞米松静滴对腰椎间盘摘除术后疼痛的疗效[J].脊柱外科杂志,2006,4(5):317-317. 被引量:2
  • 4Otero Vich JM.Update on the Cloward procedure:new instruments.J Neurosurg.1994;81(5):716-720.
  • 5An HS,Simpson JM,Glover JM,et al.Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion.A prospective multicenter study.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).1995:20(20):2211-2216.
  • 6Bishop RC,Moore KA,Hadley MN.Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate:a prospective comparative analysis.J Neurosurg.1996;85(2):206-210.
  • 7Savolainen S,Usenius JP,Hernesniemi J.Iliac crest versus artificial bone grafts in 250 cervical fusions.Acta Neurochir(Wien).1994;129(1-2):54-57.
  • 8Leize EM,Hemmerle J,Voegel JC,et al.Characterization and histological analyses of a coral-collagen composite used for bone-replacement graft material:a report of clinical cases.J Mater Sci Mater Med.1999;10(1):47-51.
  • 9Ganapathi M,Joseph G,Savage R,et al.MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws:the effect of screw type,screw orientation and imaging parameters.J Hand Surg Br.2002:27(2):165-170.
  • 10Thalgott JS,Xiongsheng C,Giuffre JM.Single stage anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages,local bone graft,and anterior plating.Spine J.2003;3(4):294-300.

共引文献51

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部