比较法的规范性适用

The Normative Application of Comparative Law

规范性是法律实践功能的关键。在比较法学科实践转向的过程中,比较法规范性司法适用成为重要的研究议题。正基于此,比较法在各国司法中的应用引发了规范性理由和基础的讨论。比较法功能主义、共同法进路和新法律多元主义为比较法规范性适用提供了理论解释。在各国的多样实践中,法理学、特别是实证法理论也为比较法的规范性问题提供了可能根据,其中沃尔德伦的“实证的共识主义”和夏皮罗的“规划理论”即为代表。比较法的规范性司法适用体现了法律功能的共性,展现了多元法律文明实践性融通的维度,应该获得认真的对待。

Normativity is the key to the function of legal practice.In the process of the practical turn of comparative law disciplines,the normative judicial application of comparative law has become an important research topic.Because of this,the application of comparative law in the judicature of various countries has triggered a discussion of normative reasons and foundations.The functionalism of comparative law,the path of common law and the pluralism of new law provide theoretical explanations for the normative application of comparative law.In the diverse practices of various countries,jurisprudence,especially the theory of empirical law,also provides a possible basis for the normative issues of comparative law,Waldron’s“empirical consensus”and Shapiro’s“planning theory”are representative of this.The normative judicial application of comparative law reflects the commonness of legal functions and shows the dimension of practical integration of multiple legal civilizations,which should be taken seriously.