期刊文献+

中西方工程哲学自立自强之路比较研究——以“工程”概念研究为例 被引量:3

A Comparative Analysis of the Self-reliant and Self-strengthening Path of Chinese and Western Philosophy of Engineering:Take Concept Research of Engineering as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《工程哲学引论——我造物故我在》的历史贡献是开启了“工程”概念的独立建构过程,并最终建立了一个独立的、充分的、可靠的工程哲学。“工程”概念的独立运动起源于20世纪80年代,在21世纪初“科学、技术、工程”三元论的基础上成为独立的哲学概念。与西方离散化研究进路不同,《工程哲学引论——我造物故我在》开启了一条“工程概念”的“全生命周期”研究进路,提供了一个不同于西方工程哲学研究的完整频谱,构建了中国工程哲学话语体系。中国工程哲学已经从存在论角度基本完成对人工物世界的勾勒,未来发展空间是从造物论视角进行工程设计哲学研究。 The historical contribution of Li Bocong’s An Introduction to the Philosophy of Engineering:I Create,Therefore I Am is to initiate the process of independent construction of the concept of“engineering”,and finally establish an independent,sufficient,and reliable engineering philosophy.The independent movement of the concept of“engineering”originated in the 1980s,and it became an independent philosophical concept based on“the trialistic theory of science,technology and engineering”in the early 21st century.Different from the Western approach to discretization research,An Introduction to the Philosophy of Engineering:I Create,Therefore I Am opens a“full life cycle”research approach of the engineering concept.It provides a complete spectrum different from that of Western philosophy of engineering and constructs a discourse system of the Chinese engineering philosophy.Chinese engineering philosophy has completed the outline of the artificial world from the perspective of ontology,and the future development is to study engineering design philosophy from the perspective of creatology.
作者 高强 潘恩荣 Gao Qiang;Pan Enrong(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出处 《工程研究(跨学科视野中的工程)》 2022年第4期266-275,共10页 JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“技术哲学社会人工物研究”(19BZX027) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。
关键词 工程 人工物 全生命周期 存在论 engineering artifact full life cycle ontology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1克洛斯,2011年:《技术哲学:从外在进路到内在进路》,载潘恩荣《工程设计哲学--技术人工物的结构与功能之间的关系》,中国社会科学出版社.
  • 2Achterhuis, H. , 2001, American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • 3Franssen, M. , G. Lokhorst and I. van de Poel, 2010, "Philosophy of technology", in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • 4Kroes, P. , 1998, "Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technologica! objects", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 3 (3) .
  • 5Kroes, P. ,2002, "Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts", in Design Studies 23 (3) .
  • 6Koes, P. and Meijers, A. , 2000, "Introduction: a discipline in search of its identity", in The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam: JAI Press, Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • 7Mitcham, C. , 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Pitt, J. C. , 1995, "On the philosophy of technology, past and future", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 1 ( 1 - 2 ) .
  • 9Pitt, J. C. ,1999, Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges Press.
  • 10Scheele, M. , 2005, The Proper Use of Artefacts. A Philosophical Theory of The Social Constitution of Artefact Functions, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology.

共引文献38

同被引文献58

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部