期刊文献+

克里考特对大地伦理思想的修正发展及生态文明启示

Callicott’s Revision and Development of Land Ethics and Enlightenment of Ecological Civilization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利奥波德的大地伦理思想以整体主义为主要构建原则,将人与自然视为一个紧密的有机整体,主张将道德关怀的范围扩展到一切存在物,试图寻求人与自然理想的共存模式。但由于其过分强调整体的优先性忽视个体存在的价值,使大地伦理思想的发展陷入困境。克里考特在继承利奥波德大地伦理主要思想的同时,深入思考了其困境的来源,提出两条二阶模式对利奥波德受到的“环境法西斯主义”的质疑进行辩护。克里考特将“生态系统健康”作为大地伦理学的实践判据并通过“生物圈保护模式”进行实践论证,丰富发展了大地伦理思想。研究探讨这些现代西方的环境伦理观点对我国当前的环境保护和生态文明建设具有一定的借鉴意义。 Leopold’s land ethics thought takes holism as the main construction principle, regards man and nature as a close organic whole, advocates extending the scope of moral care to all beings, and tries to seek the ideal coexistence mode of man and nature. However, because it overemphasizes the priority of the whole and neglects the value of individual existence, it is questioned by some opponents, which makes the development of land ethics in trouble. While inheriting the main idea of Leopold’s land ethics, Callicott deeply thought about the source of his predicament, and put forward two second-order models to defend Leopold’s challenge of "environmental fascism". Callicott took "ecosystem health" as the practical criterion of earth ethics and demonstrated it through "biosphere protection model", which enriched and developed the land ethics thought. Studying these modern western environmental ethics views is of certain reference significance to China’s current environmental protection and ecological civilization construction.
作者 李晨 董军 LI Chen;DONG Jun(School of Marxism,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei,Anhui 230601,China)
出处 《西昌学院学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第1期74-79,共6页 Journal of Xichang University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金项目:习近平关于人与自然是生命共同体重要论述研究(19BKS155)。
关键词 大地伦理 大地共同体 整体主义 生态文明 land ethics earth community Holism ecological civilization
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献21

  • 1H.罗尔斯顿,刘耳.环境伦理学的类型[J].世界哲学,1999(4):17-22. 被引量:28
  • 2张旭春.生态法西斯主义:生态批评的尴尬[J].外国文学研究,2007,29(2):62-71. 被引量:17
  • 3李奥帕德.沙郡年记:李奥帕德的自然沉思[M].吴美真译.北京:三联书店,1999.
  • 4J.Baird Callicott and Robert Frodeman.(eds) Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy.Vol.Ⅱ,Detroit:Macmillan Reference USA,2009.
  • 5Leopold,Aldo.A Sand County Almanac,and Sketches Here and There[M].New York:University Press,1949,pp.224-225.
  • 6Biel,Janet and Staudenmaier,Peter.(eds) Ecofascism:Lessons from German Experience[M].Oakland:AK Press,1996.Bramwell,Anna.Blood and Soil:Richard Walther Darre and Hitler's "Green Party".Buckinghamshire:Kensal Press,1985.
  • 7雷根,科亨.动物权利论争[M].杨通进,江娅译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 8Regan,T.The Case for Animal Rights[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1983.
  • 9Callicott,J.B.In Defense of the Land Ethic[A].Essays in Environmental Philosophy[M].Albany,N.Y.:State University of New York Press,1989.
  • 10Callicott,J.B.The Land Ethic.In Dale Jamieson.(ed.) A Companion to Environmental Philosophy[M].Malden,Mass.:Blackwell Publishers,2001.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部