摘要
在“道”创生万物的问题上,老子更关心“道”“独立而不改”的特性,庄子则“六合之外,存而不论”,提出“通天下者一气耳”。《淮南子》对老庄道家“气”论的理解,弱化了“道”的本源性地位,而作为“道”之用“气”的地位则大大提升。这种“误读”与偏转,显示出战国思想融合趋势在汉初的延续。
On the issue that "Tao" creates all things, Lao Tzu is more concerned about the characteristics of "Tao", which is "independent and unchanging", while Zhuang Tzu "leaves everything behind" and puts forward the idea that "all things connected to the world are connected withQi";Huainanzi’s understanding of Taoism’s "Qi" theory weakens the original status of "Tao", while the status of "Qi" as the use of "Tao" is greatly enhanced. This misreading and deflection showed that the trend of ideological integration in the Warring States Period continued in the early Han Dynasty.
出处
《淮南师范学院学报》
2023年第1期41-46,共6页
Journal of Huainan Normal University
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“两汉时代‘名士’观念衍变研究”(19YJA751038)
陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目“秦汉时代‘西域’观的两歧性研究”(16JZ090)。
