期刊文献+

约束税收竞争行动对我国无形资产税收优惠政策的影响 被引量:1

The Impact of Measures for Constraining Tax Competition on China's Tax Incentives for Intangibles
原文传递
导出
摘要 税基侵蚀和利润转移(BEPS)行动计划和支柱二方案提出两种约束有害税收竞争的方案。本文通过分析两种方案对我国无形资产税收优惠政策的影响,发现我国技术转让所得优惠与BEPS第5项行动计划对无形资产优惠的要求有较大差异,因此需要在技术转让所得优惠中采纳关联法。支柱二方案将对我国部分税收优惠政策产生较大冲击,对此,本文认为我国应采取以财政补贴代替税收优惠、视同纳税加回规则和扩大增值税全额留抵退税范围等一系列措施。 The Base Erosion and Profit Shifting(BEPS)Action Plans and Pillar Two solution proposed two options to address harmful tax competition.By analyzing the impact of the two options on China's tax incentives of intangibles,the paper finds that there are great differences between the tax incentives granted to technology transfer income in China and the requirements of tax incentives for intangibles prescribed by the BEPS Action Plan 5.Therefore,it is necessary to adopt the nexus approach in the preferential treatment of technology transfer income.Pillar Two solution will have a great impact on China's certain tax incentives.In this regard,this paper argues that China should replace tax incentives with financial subsidies,adopt the deemed-tax added-back rule and expand the scope of VAT refund.
作者 李欣颐 LI Xinyi
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《国际税收》 北大核心 2023年第3期45-55,共11页 International Taxation In China
关键词 无形资产 税收优惠 有害税收竞争 税基侵蚀和利润转移 支柱二 Intangibles Tax incentive Harmful tax competition Base erosion and profit shifting Pillar Two
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献55

  • 1Romer, Paul M. Endogenous Technological Change [J]. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 1990, vol. 98 (5) : S71 - 102.
  • 2Zvi Griliches. The Search for R&D Spillovers [ J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1992, Vol. 94:S29 -S47.
  • 3Atinson and Andes. Patent Boxes - Innovation in Tax policy and Tax Policy for Innovation [ R]. The Information Technology and Innovation Founda- tion (ITIF), 2011.
  • 4J.G. Tewkshury, M.S. Crandall, W.E. Crane. Measuring the Societal Benefits of Innovation [J]. Science, 1980, Vol. 209 no. 4457 : 658 -662.
  • 5Bronwyn Hall, John Van Reenen: How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A review of the Evidence [ J ]. Research Policy, 2000, Volume 29, Issues 4 - 5 : 449 - 469.
  • 6Warda, J. , Tax Treatment of Business Investments in Intellectual Assets : An International Comparison [ R ]. OECD Science, Technology and Indus- try Working Papers, 2006, OECD Publishing.
  • 7Edwin Mansfield. Patents and Innovation : An Empirical Study [ R]. Management Science, 1986, Vol. 32, No. 2 : 173 - 181.
  • 8De Jong J. P. J. , Verhoeven W. H. J. WBSO Evaluation 2001--2005: Impact, Target Group Reach and Implementation [ M]. Ministry of Econom- ic Affairs, 2007.
  • 9Ernst C. , Spengel C. Taxation, R&D Tax Incentives and Patent Application in Europe [J]. ZEW- Centre for European Economic Research Dis- cussion Paper, 2011 (11 -024).
  • 10Czarnitzki D. , Hanal P. , Rosa J. M. Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconometric Study on Canadian Firms [ J]. Research Policy, 2011,40 (2) : 217 -229.

共引文献102

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部