摘要
在现代社会中,大量的生产任务都是由人们协作完成的。有了协作就有了个体绩效与集体绩效,基于绩效认定的资源分配不仅会对组织,也会对社会层面的公平产生影响。传统绩效认定以测量为基础,集体绩效则被视为所有可测量个体绩效的加总。由于忽视了协作关系中的不可测量之物,这种方式实际造成了组织内外的分配不公。要促进绩效认定与资源分配的公平,我们需要区分不同协作关系。其中,非专业性的协作关系可以被视为一种投资关系,每种协作关系都对应着一个协作效率,使个体绩效与集体绩效都能得到准确计算。专业性的协作关系中存在个体绩效与集体绩效的断裂,即集体绩效不能被视为个体绩效的加总。在这种关系中,我们可以把可测量个体绩效的加总视为集体绩效的一半,并把不可测量绩效视为所有协作者的共同贡献,由此计算所有协作者的个体绩效。这将使以绩效为基础的组织分配更加公平,也将使社会层面的公平正义得到促进。
In modern society,a large number of production tasks are completed by people with collaboration.With collaboration,there will be individual performance and collective performance,and resource allocation based on performance identification will not only affect the organization,but also affect the fairness of society.Traditional performance recognition is based on measurement,while collective performance is regarded as the sum of all measurable individual performance.Due to the neglect of the immeasurable things in the cooperative relationship,this way actually leads to the unfair distribution inside and outside the organization.To promote the fairness of performance recognition and resource allocation,we need to distinguish different collaborative relationships.Among them,non-professional collaboration can be regarded as an investment relationship,and each collaboration relationship corresponds to a collaboration efficiency,so that individual performance and collective performance can be accurately calculated.There is a break between individual performance and collective performance in professional collaboration,that is,collective performance cannot be regarded as the sum of individual performance.In this relationship,we can consider the sum of measurable individual performance as half of the collective performance,and the unmeasurable performance as the common contribution of all collaborators,so as to calculate the individual performance of all collaborators.This will make the performance-based organization distribution more equitable,and will also promote fairness and justice at the social level.
作者
张乾友
ZHANG Qian-you(School of Government,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2023年第1期98-108,共11页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“公共行政的社会理论研究”(21JHQ070)
南京大学文科青年跨学科团队专项“国家治理与国际治理的工具体系和话语体系研究”(011714370122)。
关键词
分工—协作
个体绩效
集体绩效
公平分配
division of labor and collaboration
individual performance
collective performance
fair distribution